Exploring demographic influences on fairness perceptions across the ML development lifecycle
Open Access
- 16 March 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in AI and Ethics
- Vol. 6 (2) , 201
Abstract
Perceived fairness in machine learning (ML) systems represents a sociotechnical phenomenon, shaped by both organizational dynamics and technical practices. Building on prior research that formalizes fairness as experienced within ML development, this study investigates perceptual gaps through a large-scale survey of around 123 ML practitioners. Shifting from outcome-focused fairness research, this work centers on how stakeholders interpret and experience fairness throughout the ML development lifecycle. Specifically, it examines how practitioner demographics influence fairness perceptions within real-world ML projects. Drawing from sociotechnical literature, this study develops and validates a survey instrument to capture these perceptions throughout the ML development lifecycle. Analysis reveals that demographic factors, including experience, gender, and education, significantly affect how fairness is perceived. The findings underscore the importance of inclusive design practices and point to actionable pathways for policy reform, targeted training, and organizational strategies aimed at promoting equity, transparency, and accountability in ML systems.Keywords
Funding Information
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineering Research and Development Center (W912HZ23C0005)
This publication has 69 references indexed in Scilit:
- Navigating fairness: practitioners’ understanding, challenges, and strategies in AI/ML developmentEmpirical Software Engineering, 2025
- Fairness-aware machine learning engineering: how far are we?Empirical Software Engineering, 2023
- “Just” accuracy? Procedural fairness demands explainability in AI-based medical resource allocationsAI & SOCIETY, 2022
- Do the Ends Justify the Means? Variation in the Distributive and Procedural Fairness of Machine Learning AlgorithmsJournal of Business Ethics, 2021
- Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial IntelligencePhilosophy & Technology, 2020
- Validity and Mechanical Turk: An assessment of exclusion methods and interactive experimentsComputers in Human Behavior, 2017
- How to analyze Likert and other rating scale dataCurrents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 2015
- Influence of confirmation biases of developers on software quality: an empirical studySoftware Quality Journal, 2012
- Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statisticsAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 2010
- The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice1988