A case study evaluation of ethics review systems for multicentre clinical trials
- 7 September 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by AMPCo in Medical Journal of Australia
- Vol. 191 (5) , 280-282
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the difference in time taken for ethics and site governance approval for multicentre clinical trials using two different systems of ethics review. Design: We evaluated the time...Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Ontario Cancer Research Ethics Board: A Central REB That WorksCurrent Oncology, 2008
- Adverse effects of a multicentre system for ethics approval on the progress of a prospective multicentre trial of cancer treatment: how many patients die waiting?Internal Medicine Journal, 2007
- Implementing a research governance framework for clinical and public health researchMedical Journal of Australia, 2006
- Centralized and Non-Centralized Ethics Review: A Five Nation StudyAccountability in Research, 2006
- Debate: should Australia move towards a centralized ethics committees system?Internal Medicine Journal, 2005
- Multicentre research: negotiating the ethics approval obstacle courseMedical Journal of Australia, 2004
- National ethics committee urgently neededMedical Journal of Australia, 2003
- A Central Institutional Review Board for Multi-Institutional TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002