Coping with mortality: responses of monkeys and great apes to collapsed, inanimate and dead conspecifics
Open Access
- 21 March 2021
- journal article
- other
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Ethology Ecology & Evolution
- Vol. 34 (1) , 1-50
Abstract
It was long assumed that only humans can distinguish the living from the dead. Renewed interest in this question over the last decade has led several authors to assert that non-human primates are also aware of death. We investigate this issue by comparing the behaviours of monkeys and great apes toward helpless conspecifics, basing our analysis on published reports. We first examine the behaviours of mothers towards the body of their dead offspring. They may carry the corpse for days or more before abandoning it. They groom, inspect and protect it, sometimes allowing group members to explore it, and rare cases of cannibalism have been reported. No significant difference is observed in the way that monkeys and great apes treat the bodies of infants. We then examine responses to collapsed (still able to move and react) and inanimate (unresponsive or dead) conspecifics. Monkeys and great apes guard, care for and inspect their helpless partners, and also manipulate and mobilise them. Through these actions, individuals may inform themselves about the state of their partners, test their responsiveness and/or attempt to rouse them. It appears that only chimpanzees and gorillas show violent action such as display behaviours and the rough treatment of bodies. They can also make distress calls, and periods of “stunned silence” sometimes occur in chimpanzees, indicating that they are experiencing intense emotion. Finally, we argue that while both monkeys and great apes detect body dysfunction through the victims’ inability to wake up and move, only great apes can understand that something serious has happened. The signs of emotional disturbance reported in them indicate that they may believe that inanimate conspecifics have entered a state of “dormancy”, meaning that they are unlikely to regain wakefulness. However, there is no evidence that any non-human primates are aware of mortality.Keywords
This publication has 148 references indexed in Scilit:
- Great apes infer others’ goals based on contextAnimal Cognition, 2012
- Maternal responses to dead infants in Yunnan snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus bieti) in the Baimaxueshan Nature Reserve, Yunnan, ChinaPrimates, 2012
- Infant monkeys’ concept of animacy: the role of eyes and fluffinessPrimates, 2011
- Cannibalism in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Lui KotaleAmerican Journal of Primatology, 2010
- Two cases of mother–infant cannibalism in orangutansPrimates, 2009
- Behavioural and hormonal responses to predation in female chacma baboons (Papio hamadryas ursinus)Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2005
- Toward a Science of Other Minds: Escaping the Argument by AnalogyCognitive Science, 2000
- Children's understanding of adverbs denoting degree of likelihoodJournal of Child Language, 1990
- Responses of mother squirrel monkeys to dead infantsPrimates, 1973
- Group activity and population dynamics of the howler monkey on Barro Colorado IslandPrimates, 1973