Aortic stenosis post-COVID-19: a mathematical model on waiting lists and mortality
Open Access
Abstract
Objectives To provide estimates for how different treatment pathways for the management of severe aortic stenosis (AS) may affect National Health Service (NHS) England waiting list duration and associated mortality. Design We constructed a mathematical model of the excess waiting list and found the closed-form analytic solution to that model. From published data, we calculated estimates for how the strategies listed under Interventions may affect the time to clear the backlog of patients waiting for treatment and the associated waiting list mortality. Setting The NHS in England. Participants Estimated patients with AS in England. Interventions (1) Increasing the capacity for the treatment of severe AS, (2) converting proportions of cases from surgery to transcatheter aortic valve implantation and (3) a combination of these two. Results In a capacitated system, clearing the backlog by returning to pre-COVID-19 capacity is not possible. A conversion rate of 50% would clear the backlog within 666 (533–848) days with 1419 (597–2189) deaths while waiting during this time. A 20% capacity increase would require 535 (434–666) days, with an associated mortality of 1172 (466–1859). A combination of converting 40% cases and increasing capacity by 20% would clear the backlog within a year (343 (281–410) days) with 784 (292–1324) deaths while awaiting treatment. Conclusion A strategy change to the management of severe AS is required to reduce the NHS backlog and waiting list deaths during the post-COVID-19 ‘recovery’ period. However, plausible adaptations will still incur a substantial wait to treatment and many hundreds dying while waiting.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- EPSRC Cambridge Centre for Mathematics of Information (EP/T017961/1)
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-Term Durability of Transcatheter Aortic Valve ProsthesesJACC, 2019
- Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing as a Key Component of the Value Platform: A Pilot Analysis of Colonoscopy, Aortic Valve Replacement and Carpal Tunnel Release ProceduresJournal of Clinical Medicine Research, 2018
- Natural History, Diagnostic Approaches, and Therapeutic Strategies for Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic StenosisJACC, 2016
- Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2016
- Temporal Trends in the Incidence and Prognosis of Aortic StenosisCirculation, 2015
- Patients with aortic stenosis referred for TAVI: treatment decision, in-hospital outcome and determinants of survivalNetherlands Heart Journal, 2011
- Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Increased Surgical Risk According to Treatment ModalityJACC, 2011
- Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in High-Risk PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Who Cannot Undergo SurgeryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- The effect of aortic valve replacement on survival.Circulation, 1982