Assessing the quality of the steps to reproduce in bug reports
Authors:
Open Access
- 12 August 2019
- conference paper
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 86-96
Abstract
No abstract availableAll Related Versions
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reproducing failures based on semiformal failure scenario descriptionsSoftware Quality Journal, 2016
- Neural Architectures for Named Entity Recognition2016
- Auto-completing bug reports for Android applications2015
- Works for me! characterizing non-reproducible bug reports2014
- Automated Generation of Oracles for Testing User-Interaction Features of Mobile Apps2014
- The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit2014
- Survey Reproduction of Defect Reporting in Industrial Software Development2011
- What makes a good bug report?2008
- Modeling bug report quality2007
- Text Chunking Using Transformation-Based Learning1999