Startup cash flows and venture capital investments: A real options approach
- 14 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Managerial and Decision Economics
- Vol. 42 (3) , 737-750
Abstract
This paper studies venture capitalists' (VCs') sequential investment decisions in a real options model. We account for VCs' risk aversion, agency costs, and VC activism. We identify two separate investment policies: when startups have positive cash flows, more risk averse and more active VCs expedite their investments while higher agency costs delay staged investments. The opposite is true for negative‐cash‐flow startups. The model predicts a negative relation between risk aversion and stage length in line with the idea that VCs use stage length as a monitoring tool. We also show that higher growth rates and lower volatility encourage earlier investments.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Venture Capital and Sequential InvestmentsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2010
- Private Equity Syndication: Agency Costs, Reputation and CollaborationJournal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2009
- Who are the active investors?☆Evidence from venture capitalJournal of Financial Economics, 2008
- The timing of initial public offeringsJournal of Financial Economics, 2005
- Characteristics, Contracts, and Actions: Evidence from Venture Capitalist AnalysesThe Journal of Finance, 2004
- Financing and Advising: Optimal Financial Contracts with Venture CapitalistsThe Journal of Finance, 2003
- Venture‐Capital Syndication: Improved Venture Selection vs. The Value‐Added HypothesisJournal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2002
- A comparison of business angel and venture capitalist investment procedures: An agency theory-based analysisVenture Capital, 2000
- Optimal Investment, Monitoring, and the Staging of Venture CapitalThe Journal of Finance, 1995
- The structure and governance of venture-capital organizationsJournal of Financial Economics, 1990