Double jeopardy – Double remedy? The effectiveness of self-affirmation for improving doubly disadvantaged students' mathematical performance
Authors:
- 1 August 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of School Psychology
- Vol. 75, 58-73
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Stiftung Mercator
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gender-, race-, and income-based stereotype threat: the effects of multiple stigmatized aspects of identity on math performance and working memory functionSocial Psychology of Education, 2013
- Reducing the Gender Achievement Gap in College Science: A Classroom Study of Values AffirmationScience, 2010
- When Self-Affirmations Reduce Defensiveness: Timing Is KeyPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2010
- Cognitive consequences of affirming the self: The relationship between self-affirmation and object construalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2009
- Recursive Processes in Self-Affirmation: Intervening to Close the Minority Achievement GapScience, 2009
- Experimental manipulations of self-affirmation: A systematic reviewSelf and Identity, 2006
- Dilemmas in Scaling Up Innovations in Elementary Science Instruction With Nonmainstream StudentsAmerican Educational Research Journal, 2005
- Not All Self-affirmations Were Created Equal: The Cognitive and Social Benefits of Affirming The Intrinsic (vs. Extrinsic) SelfSocial Cognition, 2004
- Stereotype Threat in the Classroom: Dejection Mediates the Disrupting Threat Effect on Women’s Math PerformancePersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2003
- Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995