Prediction of standard cell types and functional markers from textual descriptions of flow cytometry gating definitions using machine learning
- 7 March 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry
- Vol. 102 (3) , 220-227
Abstract
Background A key step in clinical flow cytometry data analysis is gating, which involves the identification of cell populations. The process of gating produces a set of reportable results, which are typically described by gating definitions. The non-standardized, non-interpreted nature of gating definitions represents a hurdle for data interpretation and data sharing across and within organizations. Interpreting and standardizing gating definitions for subsequent analysis of gating results requires a curation effort from experts. Machine learning approaches have the potential to help in this process by predicting expert annotations associated with gating definitions. Methods We created a gold-standard dataset by manually annotating thousands of gating definitions with cell type and functional marker annotations. We used this dataset to train and test a machine learning pipeline able to predict standard cell types and functional marker genes associated with gating definitions. Results The machine learning pipeline predicted annotations with high accuracy for both cell types and functional marker genes. Accuracy was lower for gating definitions from assays belonging to laboratories from which limited or no prior data was available in the training. Manual error review ensured that resulting predicted annotations could be reused subsequently as additional gold-standard training data. Conclusions Machine learning methods are able to consistently predict annotations associated with gating definitions from flow cytometry assays. However, a hybrid automatic and manual annotation workflow would be recommended to achieve optimal results.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- How validated receptor occupancy flow cytometry assays can impact decisions and support drug developmentCytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry, 2015
- Flow Cytometry: Impact on Early Drug DiscoverySLAS Discovery, 2015
- Cell Surface Profiling Using High-Throughput Flow Cytometry: A Platform for Biomarker Discovery and Analysis of Cellular HeterogeneityPLOS ONE, 2014
- Quantifying the complexity of medical researchBioinformatics, 2013
- Visible and near infrared fluorescence spectral flow cytometryCytometry Part A, 2012
- A model for harmonizing flow cytometry in clinical trialsNature Immunology, 2010
- The Protein Ontology: a structured representation of protein forms and complexesNucleic Acids Research, 2010
- Randomized Clinical Trials With Biomarkers: Design IssuesJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2010
- A chromatic explosion: the development and future of multiparameter flow cytometryImmunology, 2008
- Quantitative Assessment of Dictionary-based Protein Named Entity TaggingJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2006