The Space Between: Demonization of Opponents and Policy Divergence
Author:
- 10 January 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Review of Policy Research
- Vol. 35 (2) , 280-301
Abstract
Prior research on policy conflicts indicates a tendency among policy actors to misperceive the influence of actors engaged in policy debates based on the degree of distance between their relative policy positions. This research develops a measure for assessing the degree and direction of the misperception effect. This measure is then utilized as a dependent variable to assess the relationship between theoretically relevant factors and the degree to which actors will exaggerate the influence of their opponents and allies. The research uses original survey data of policy actors engaged in the debate over hydraulic fracturing in New York. The results indicate misperceptions of relative influence are prevalent and most associated with the experience of a policy loss and holding relatively extreme policy beliefs. The findings provide new insight into factors that influence the demonization of political opponents. These insights are timely in the context of polarized debates over environmental and energy policy in the United States.Keywords
Funding Information
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Affect, Not IdeologyPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2012
- Foes to Friends: Changing Contexts and Changing Intergroup PerceptionsJournal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 2011
- Policy Narratives and Policy ProcessesPolicy Studies Journal, 2011
- Regulating hydraulic fracturing in shale gas plays: The case of TexasEnergy Policy, 2011
- Belief Systems and Social Capital as Drivers of Policy Network Structure: The Case of California Regional PlanningJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2010
- Familiarity Breeds Trust: Collective Action in a Policy DomainThe Journal of Politics, 2007
- To Trust an Adversary: Integrating Rational and Psychological Models of Collaborative PolicymakingAmerican Political Science Review, 2005
- Social Metacognition: An Expansionist ReviewPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 1998
- Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analyses of Political ChoiceAmerican Political Science Review, 1988
- Pressures Toward Uniformity of Performance in GroupsHuman Relations, 1957