Standardized (simulated) patients' accuracy in recording clinical performance check‐list items
Authors:
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Medical Education
- Vol. 26 (2) , 99-104
Abstract
Summary. In large‐scale performance‐based assessment of medical professionals' clinical competence, simulated patients (standardized patients ‐ SPs) are used not only to simulate case problems but also to record on check‐list the examinees' clinical performance during their encounter with the SPs. The purposes of this study were to determine the SPs' overall accuracy in recording check‐list items, and whether their accuracy was affected by the various characteristics of the check‐list, and by the different times during a day and the different days within the examination when the recordings were obtained. Results showed that the SPs' accuracy in recording check‐list items was good to very good and was affected by the length of the check‐list, as well as by the type and the clarity of the check‐list item. It was further found that the SPs' accuracy was consistent and did not vary over the course of a one‐day or a 15‐day examination.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sources of unreliability and bias in standardized‐patient ratingTeaching and Learning in Medicine, 1991
- Evaluating the clinical skills of foreign medical school graduates participating in an internship preparation programAcademic Medicine, 1990
- Psychometric characteristics of the objective structured clinical examinationMedical Education, 1988
- Direct, standardized assessment of clinical competenceMedical Education, 1987
- An objective measure of clinical performanceThe American Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Simulated patients in general practice: a different look at the consultation.BMJ, 1987
- Assessing Clinical Skills of Residents with Standardized PatientsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1986
- Measuring physiciansʼ performances by using simulated patientsAcademic Medicine, 1985