Misinformation warning labels are widely effective: A review of warning effects and their moderating features
Authors:
Top Cited Papers
- 19 October 2023
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Current Opinion in Psychology
- Vol. 54, 101710
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (2021-16891)
- National Science Foundation (2047152)
- National Science Foundation (174530)
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Swiss cheese model for mitigating online misinformationBulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 2021
- The Psychology of Fake NewsTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2021
- Timing matters when correcting fake newsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2021
- The Implied Truth Effect: Attaching Warnings to a Subset of Fake News Headlines Increases Perceived Accuracy of Headlines Without WarningsManagement Science, 2020
- State media warning labels can counteract the effects of foreign disinformation2020
- The Ineffectiveness of Fact-Checking Labels on News Memes and ArticlesMass Communication and Society, 2020
- Fake Claims of Fake News: Political Misinformation, Warnings, and the Tainted Truth EffectPolitical Behavior, 2020
- Cleaning Up Social Media: The Effect of Warning Labels on Likelihood of Sharing False News on FacebookPolicy & Internet, 2019
- Real Solutions for Fake News? Measuring the Effectiveness of General Warnings and Fact-Check Tags in Reducing Belief in False Stories on Social MediaPolitical Behavior, 2019
- Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influencePLOS ONE, 2017