Real-time estimated Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score with intervals: improved risk monitoring with estimated uncertainty in health condition for patients in intensive care units
Authors:
- 31 December 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Health Information Science and Systems
- Vol. 13 (1) , 1-10
Abstract
Purpose Real-time risk monitoring is critical but challenging in intensive care units (ICUs) due to the lack of real-time updates for most clinical variables. Although real-time predictions have been integrated into various risk monitoring systems, existing systems do not address uncertainties in risk assessments. We developed a novel framework based on commonly used systems like the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score by incorporating uncertainties to improve the effectiveness of real-time risk monitoring. Methods This study included 5351 patients admitted to the Cardiothoracic ICU in the National University Hospital in Singapore. We developed machine learning models to predict long lead-time variables and computed real-time SOFA scores using predictions. We calculated intervals to capture uncertainties in risk assessments and validated the association of the estimated real-time scores and intervals with mortality and readmission. Results Our model outperforms SOFA score in predicting 24-h mortality: Nagelkerke’s R-squared (0.224 vs. 0.185, p < 0.001) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.870 vs. 0.843, p < 0.001), and significantly outperforms quick SOFA (Nagelkerke’s R-squared = 0.125, AUC = 0.778). Our model also performs better in predicting 30-day readmission. We confirmed a positive net reclassification improvement (NRI) of our model over the SOFA score (0.184, p < 0.001). Similarly, we enhanced two additional scoring systems. Conclusions Incorporating uncertainties improved existing scores in real-time monitoring, which could be used to trigger on-demand laboratory tests, potentially improving early detection, reducing unnecessary testing, and thereby lowering healthcare expenditures, mortality, and readmission rates in clinical practice.Keywords
Funding Information
- Ministry of Education, Singapore (C207MSS16B016)
- IBSS Development Fund, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (IBSSDF-0324-65)
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adultsThe Lancet, 2010
- Impact of Anemia on Clinical Outcomes of Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Relation to Gender and Adjunctive Antithrombotic Therapy (from the HORIZONS-AMI Trial)The American Journal of Cardiology, 2010
- Clinical review: Scoring systems in the critically illCritical Care, 2010
- Effect of laboratory testing guidelines on the utilization of tests and order entries in a surgical intensive care unit*Critical Care Medicine, 2008
- Reducing Unnecessary Inpatient Laboratory Testing in a Teaching HospitalAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2006
- Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratiosBMJ, 2004
- Serial Evaluation of the SOFA Score to Predict Outcome in Critically Ill PatientsJAMA, 2001
- Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of careCritical Care Medicine, 2001
- Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care unitsCritical Care Medicine, 1998
- The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failureIntensive Care Medicine, 1996