Occupational prestige, social mobility and the association with lung cancer in men
Authors:
- Thomas BehrensTBThomas Behrens
- Isabelle GroßIGIsabelle Groß
- Jack SiemiatyckiJSJack Siemiatycki
- David I. ConwayDCDavid I. Conway
- Ann OlssonAOAnn Olsson
- Isabelle StückerISIsabelle Stücker
- Florence GuidaFGFlorence Guida
- Karl-Heinz JöckelKJKarl-Heinz Jöckel
- Hermann PohlabelnHPHermann Pohlabeln
- Wolfgang AhrensWAWolfgang Ahrens
- Irene BrüskeIBIrene Brüske
- Heinz-Erich WichmannHWHeinz-Erich Wichmann
Open Access
- 7 July 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Cancer
- Vol. 16 (1) , 1-12
Abstract
The nature of the association between occupational social prestige, social mobility, and risk of lung cancer remains uncertain. Using data from the international pooled SYNERGY case–control study, we studied the association between lung cancer and the level of time-weighted average occupational social prestige as well as its lifetime trajectory. We included 11,433 male cases and 14,147 male control subjects. Each job was translated into an occupational social prestige score by applying Treiman’s Standard International Occupational Prestige Scale (SIOPS). SIOPS scores were categorized as low, medium, and high prestige (reference). We calculated odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for study center, age, smoking, ever employment in a job with known lung carcinogen exposure, and education. Trajectories in SIOPS categories from first to last and first to longest job were defined as consistent, downward, or upward. We conducted several subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of our results. We observed increased lung cancer risk estimates for men with medium (OR = 1.23; 95 % CI 1.13–1.33) and low occupational prestige (OR = 1.44; 95 % CI 1.32–1.57). Although adjustment for smoking and education reduced the associations between occupational prestige and lung cancer, they did not explain the association entirely. Traditional occupational exposures reduced the associations only slightly. We observed small associations with downward prestige trajectories, with ORs of 1.13, 95 % CI 0.88–1.46 for high to low, and 1.24; 95 % CI 1.08–1.41 for medium to low trajectories. Our results indicate that occupational prestige is independently associated with lung cancer among men.Keywords
Funding Information
- Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung (DE) (FP 271)
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Losing life and livelihood: A systematic review and meta-analysis of unemployment and all-cause mortalitySocial Science & Medicine, 2011
- Socioeconomic Disparities in Health in the United States: What the Patterns Tell UsAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2010
- Life course social mobility and risk of upper aerodigestive tract cancer in menEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 2010
- Occupational exposures contribute to educational inequalities in lung cancer incidence among men: Evidence from the EPIC prospective cohort studyInternational Journal of Cancer, 2009
- The Role of Smoking and Diet in Explaining Educational Inequalities in Lung Cancer IncidenceJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2009
- Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health in 22 European CountriesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Do stress-related psychosocial factors contribute to cancer incidence and survival?Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 2008
- Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 2)Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2006
- Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1): Figure 1Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2005
- Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective.Social Forces, 1980