The effect of specialist care within the first year on subsequent outcomes in 24 232 adults with new-onset diabetes mellitus: population-based cohort study
Open Access
- 1 February 2007
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Quality and Safety in Health Care
- Vol. 16 (1) , 6-11
Abstract
Background: Although specialty care has been shown to improve short-term outcomes in patients hospitalised with acute medical conditions, its effect on patients with chronic conditions treated in the ambulatory care setting is less clear. Objective: To examine whether specialty care (ie, consultative care provided by an endocrinologist or a general internist in concert with a patient’s primary care doctor) within the first year of diagnosis is associated with improved outcomes after the first year for adults with diabetes mellitus treated as outpatients. Design: Population-based cohort study using linked administrative data. Setting: The province of Saskatchewan, Canada. Sample: 24 232 adults newly diagnosed with diabetes mellitus between 1991 and 2001. Method: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Analyses used multivariate Cox proportional hazards models with time-dependent covariates, propensity scores and case mix variables (demographic, disease severity and comorbidities). In addition, restriction analyses examined the effect of specialist care in low-risk subgroups. Results: The median age of patients was 61 years, and over a mean follow-up of 4.9 years 2932 (12%) died. Patients receiving specialty care were younger, had a greater burden of comorbidities, and visited doctors more often before and after their diabetes diagnosis (all p⩽0.001). Compared with patients seen by primary care doctors alone, patients seen by specialists and primary care doctors were more likely to receive recommended treatments (all p⩽0.001), but were more likely to die (13.1% v 11.7%, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08 to 1.27). This association persisted even in patients without comorbidities or target organ damage (adjusted HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.34). Conclusion: Specialty care was associated with better disease-specific process measures but not improved survival in adults with diabetes cared for in ambulatory care settings.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality of care in diabetic patients attending routine primary care clinics compared with those attending GP specialist clinicsDiabetic Medicine, 2006
- Diabetic patients with prior specialist care have better glycaemic control than those with prior primary careJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2005
- Impact of specialist follow-up in outpatients with congestive heart failureCanadian Medical Association Journal, 2005
- Multidisciplinary strategies for the management of heart failure patients at high risk for admissionJACC, 2004
- The association of diabetes specialist care with health care practices and glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional analysis from the Pittsburgh epidemiology of diabetes complications study.Diabetes Care, 2000
- Is the Quality of Diabetes Care Better in a Diabetes Clinic or in a General Medicine Clinic?Diabetes Care, 1997
- Attending the Diabetes Center Is Associated With Increased 5-Year Survival Probability of Diabetic Patients: The Verona Diabetes StudyDiabetes Care, 1996
- Variation in office-based quality. A claims-based profile of care provided to Medicare patients with diabetes1995
- Replicating the chronic disease score (CDS) from automated pharmacy dataJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- A chronic disease score from automated pharmacy dataJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992