Understanding the Context of Health for Persons With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Moving From What Is the Matter to What Matters

Authors:
  • EBElizabeth A. Bayliss
    Elizabeth A. Bayliss
  • DBDenise E. Bonds
    Denise E. Bonds
  • CBCynthia M. Boyd
    Cynthia M. Boyd
  • MDMelinda M. Davis
    Melinda M. Davis
  • BFBruce Finke
    Bruce Finke
  • MFMichael H. Fox
    Michael H. Fox
  • RGRussell E. Glasgow
    Russell E. Glasgow
  • RGRichard A. Goodman
    Richard A. Goodman
  • SHSuzanne Heurtin-Roberts
    Suzanne Heurtin-Roberts
  • SLSue Lachenmayr
    Sue Lachenmayr
  • CLCristin Lind
    Cristin Lind
  • EMElizabeth A. Madigan
    Elizabeth A. Madigan
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
PURPOSE An isolated focus on 1 disease at a time is insufficient to generate the scientific evidence needed to improve the health of persons living with more than 1 chronic condition. This article explores how to bring context into research efforts to improve the health of persons living with multiple chronic conditions (MCC). METHODS Forty-five experts, including persons with MCC, family and friend caregivers, researchers, policy makers, funders, and clinicians met to critically consider 4 aspects of incorporating context into research on MCC: key contextual factors, needed research, essential research methods for understanding important contextual factors, and necessary partnerships for catalyzing collaborative action in conducting and applying research. RESULTS Key contextual factors involve complementary perspectives across multiple levels: public policy, community, health care systems, family, and person, as well as the cellular and molecular levels where most research currently is focused. Needed research involves moving from a disease focus toward a person-driven, goal-directed research agenda. Relevant research methods are participatory, flexible, multilevel, quantitative and qualitative, conducive to longitudinal dynamic measurement from diverse data sources, sufficiently detailed to consider what works for whom in which situation, and generative of ongoing communities of learning, living and practice. Important partnerships for collaborative action include cooperation among members of the research enterprise, health care providers, community-based support, persons with MCC and their family and friend caregivers, policy makers, and payers, including government, public health, philanthropic organizations, and the business community. CONCLUSION Consistent attention to contextual factors is needed to enhance health research for persons with MCC. Rigorous, integrated, participatory, multimethod approaches to generate new knowledge and diverse partnerships can be used to increase the relevance of research to make health care more sustainable, safe, equitable and effective, to reduce suffering, and to improve quality of life.

This publication has 80 references indexed in Scilit: