Independent associations in observational studies: Biased beyond confounding
- 1 October 2021
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Critical Care
- Vol. 65, 124-125
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attention to Immortal Time Bias in Critical Care ResearchAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2021
- Observational Research for Therapies Titrated to Effect and Associated With Severity of Illness: Misleading Results From Commonly Used Statistical Methods*Critical Care Medicine, 2020
- Ten Pearls and Pitfalls of Propensity Scores in Critical Care Research: A Guide for Clinicians and ResearchersCritical Care Medicine, 2019
- Impact on mortality of prompt admission to critical care for deteriorating ward patients: an instrumental variable analysis using critical care bed strainIntensive Care Medicine, 2018
- The C-Word: Scientific Euphemisms Do Not Improve Causal Inference From Observational DataAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2018
- Intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired bacteraemia and ICU mortality and discharge: addressing time-varying confounding using appropriate methodologyJournal of Hospital Infection, 2018
- Survival biases lead to flawed conclusions in observational treatment studies of influenza patientsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2017
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016Critical Care Medicine, 2017
- When do confounding by indication and inadequate risk adjustment bias critical care studies? A simulation studyCritical Care, 2015
- Driving Pressure and Survival in the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2015