Before and after implementation of group antenatal care in Rwanda: a qualitative study of women’s experiences
Open Access
- 27 June 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Reproductive Health
- Vol. 16 (1) , 1-9
Abstract
The Preterm Birth Initiative-Rwanda is conducting a 36-cluster randomized controlled trial of group antenatal and postnatal care. In the context of this trial, we collected qualitative data before and after implementation. The purpose was two-fold. First, to inform the design of the group care program before implementation and second, to document women’s experiences of group care at the mid-point of the trial to make ongoing programmatic adjustments and improvements. We completed 8 focus group discussions among women of reproductive age before group care implementation and 6 focus group discussions among women who participated in group antenatal care and/or postnatal care at 18 health centers that introduced the model, approximately 9 months after implementation. Before implementation, focus group participants reported both enthusiasm for the potential for support and insight from a group of peers and concern about the risk of sharing private information with peers who may judge, mock, or gossip. After implementation, group care participants reported benefits including increased knowledge, peer support, and more satisfying relationships with providers. When asked about barriers to group care participation, none of them cited concern about privacy but instead cited lack of financial resources, lack of cooperation from a male partner, and long distances to the health center. Finally, women stated that the group care experience would be improved if all participants and providers arrived on time and remained focused on the group care visit throughout. These results are consistent with other published reports of women’s perceptions of group antenatal care, especially increased pregnancy- and parenting-related knowledge, peer support, and improved relationships with health care providers. Some results were unexpected, especially the consequences of staff allocation patterns that resulted in providers arriving late for group visits or having to leave during group visits to attend to other facility services, which diminished women’s experiences of care. Group antenatal and postnatal care provide compelling benefits to women and families. If the model requires the addition of human resources at the health center, intensive reminder communications, and large-scale community outreach to benefit the largest number of pregnant and postnatal mothers, those additional resources required must be factored into any future decision to scale a group care model. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03154177 .Keywords
Funding Information
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1107312)
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- ‘They would never receive you without a husband’: Paradoxical barriers to antenatal care scale-up in RwandaMidwifery, 2015
- AfyaJamii: Introducing a group prenatal and postnatal care model in KenyaAnnals of Global Health, 2015
- Group versus conventional antenatal care for womenCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015
- Assessing predictors of delayed antenatal care visits in Rwanda: a secondary analysis of Rwanda demographic and health survey 2010BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2014
- Paternal Perceptions of and Satisfaction with Group Prenatal Care in BotswanaOnline Journal of Cultural Competence in Nursing and Healthcare, 2014
- CenteringPregnancy-Africa: A pilot of group antenatal care to address Millennium Development GoalsMidwifery, 2013
- Towards Universal Health Coverage: An Evaluation of Rwanda Mutuelles in Its First Eight YearsPLOS ONE, 2012
- Does Group Prenatal Care Affect Satisfaction And Prenatal Care Utilization in Iranian Pregnant Women?2010
- Comparison of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Group Versus Individual Prenatal Care: A New Experience in IranHealth Care for Women International, 2010
- WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal careThe Lancet, 2001