Opportunities and Threats of Adopting Digital Twin in Construction Projects: A Review
Open Access
Abstract
Digital twin (DT) is recognized as a pillar in the transition from traditional to digital construction, yet the risks (opportunities and threats) associated with its implementation have not been thoroughly determined in the literature. In addition, there is a scarcity of research relating the risks of DT implementation to DT maturity levels, which has hindered the optimum consideration of such risks when DT is adopted at different maturity levels. To address these gaps, this study conducted a literature review of 1889 documents from Scopus and Web of Science databases. After rigorous filtration, 72 documents were selected and comprehensively reviewed. A total of 47 risk factors (RFs) were identified and categorized into opportunities (economic, technical, environmental and sustainability, monitoring and safety, and management) and threats (economic, technical, and policy and management). Subsequently, these RFs were mapped onto the five-level DT maturity model, providing users with insights into opportunities and threats on each level. The exhaustive list of RFs and proposed integration of a DT maturity model with corresponding RFs enables stakeholders to identify the risks in their specific use cases and facilitate the decision-making and success in transition across various levels of DT in real-life construction projects.Keywords
This publication has 130 references indexed in Scilit:
- A review of digital twin capabilities, technologies, and applications based on the maturity modelAdvanced Engineering Informatics, 2024
- Digital twin-driven intelligence disaster prevention and mitigation for infrastructure: advances, challenges, and opportunitiesNatural Hazards, 2022
- Digital Twin and Cities2022
- Digital Transformation in Industry2022
- A state-of-the-art survey of Digital Twin: techniques, engineering product lifecycle management and business innovation perspectivesJournal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2019
- Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resourcesResearch Synthesis Methods, 2019
- Digital twinning of existing reinforced concrete bridges from labelled point clustersAutomation in Construction, 2019
- Data Science in Action2016
- Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparisonScientometrics, 2015
- Comparing keywords plus of WOS and author keywords: A case study of patient adherence researchJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015