Geographic and intra‐racial disparities in early‐onset colorectal cancer in the SEER 18 registries of the United States
Open Access
- 22 October 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Cancer Medicine
- Vol. 9 (23) , 9150-9159
Abstract
Background: Although early‐onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) incidence rates (IRs) are increasing, geographic and intra‐racial IR disparities are not well defined.Methods: 2000‐2015 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program CRC IR Analysis (170,434 cases) was performed from ages 30 to 60 in four US regions, 18 individual registries, metropolitan and nonmetropolitan locations and stratified by race. Analyses were conducted in 1‐year and 5‐year age increments.Results: Wide US regional EOCRC IR variations exist: For example, age 45 IRs in the south are 26.8/100,000, 36.0% higher than the West, 19.7/100,000 (p < 0.0001). Disparities magnify between individual registries: EOCRC IRs in highest risk registries were 177‐348% (Alaska Natives), 75‐200% (Hawaii), 76‐128% (Louisiana), and 61‐125% (Kentucky) higher than lowest risk registries depending on age. EOCRC IRs are 18.2%‐25.6% higher in nonmetropolitan versus metropolitan settings. Wide geographic intra‐racial disparities exist. Within the White population, the greatest IR difference (78.8%) was between Kentucky (5.9/100,000) and Los Angeles (3.3/100,000) in 30‐ to 34‐year‐olds (p < .0001). Within the Black population, the greatest difference (136.2%) was between rural Georgia (30.7/100,000) and California excluding San Francisco‐Oakland/San Jose‐Monterey/Los Angeles (13/100,000) in 40‐ to 44‐year‐olds (p = 0003).Conclusion: Marked geographic EOCRC disparities exist with disproportionately high IRs in Alaska Natives, Hawaii, and southern registries. Geographic intra‐racial disparities are present within White and Black populations. In Blacks, there are disproportionately high EOCRC IRs in rural Georgia. Although vigilance is required in all populations, attention must be paid to these higher risk populations. Potential interventions include assuring early investigation of symptoms, targeting modifiable risk factors and utilizing earlier age 45 screening options supported by some guidelines.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Increased risk for colorectal cancer under age 50 in racial and ethnic minorities living in the United StatesCancer Medicine, 2015
- Where Can Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions Have the Most Impact?Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2015
- ACG Clinical Guideline: Genetic Testing and Management of Hereditary Gastrointestinal Cancer SyndromesAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2015
- The History of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Personal PerspectiveDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 2015
- Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rates in the Louisiana Acadian Parishes Demonstrated to be Among the Highest in the United StatesClinical and Translational Gastroenterology, 2014
- The Increasing Incidence of Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Call to ActionMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2014
- Urban–rural disparities in colorectal cancer screening: cross‐sectional analysis of 1998–2005 data from the Centers for Disease Control's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance StudyCancer Medicine, 2012
- The role of patient navigators in eliminating health disparitiesCancer, 2011
- Regional differences in colorectal cancer incidence, stage, and subsite among American Indians and Alaska Natives, 1999-2004Cancer, 2008
- Effect of area poverty rate on cancer screening across US communitiesJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2006