Promoting home ownership in a social‐rented city: policies, practices and pitfalls
- 1 May 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Housing Studies
- Vol. 19 (3) , 483-495
Abstract
Amsterdam's housing market is dominated by the social‐rented sector. It comprises 56 per cent of the total housing stock, while home ownership comprises only 19 per cent, lower than anywhere else in the Netherlands, and among the lowest in the world. Central government policy is currently seeking to increase the share of home ownership in the Netherlands from 53 per cent (2001) to 65 per cent in 2010. This paper will summarise recent national and local (Amsterdam) housing policy developments, focusing on the recent practice of selling social housing in Amsterdam. Unlike the Right to Buy scheme in Britain, the Netherlands employs an ‘offer to buy’ strategy. Sales, however, have been disappointing so far. Two factors were found to be crucial in this regard: (1) the sluggish change in ‘policy mentality’ and bureaucracy and (2) the high prices in the home ownership market. By way of conclusion, the paper reflects on the desirability of shifting the tenure structure from tenancy to ownership and on the risks that an (over‐) emphasis on home ownership may bring.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pressure and suction on housing markets: a critical reply to PriemusEuropean Journal of Housing Policy, 2003
- The Changing Tenant Profile of Dutch Social Rented HousingUrban Studies, 2002
- Housing and Social Fragmentation in the NetherlandsHousing Studies, 2000
- POLICY REVIEW - Regime Shifts in Dutch Housing PolicyHousing Studies, 1999
- Housing Turks and Moroccans in Brussels and Amsterdam: The Difference between Private and Public MarketsUrban Studies, 1998
- The Position of Former Council Homes in the Housing MarketUrban Studies, 1996