Transitioning of Patients from Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulant to Heparin: Impact on Laboratory Testing
Open Access
- 13 November 2025
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis
- Vol. 52 (08) , 982-990
Abstract
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran) and direct factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban), have transformed anticoagulant management in recent years due to their predictable pharmacodynamics, rapid onset of action, and fixed dosing without the need for routine laboratory monitoring. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) remains the anticoagulant of choice for patients who are acutely unwell and treated in intensive care units due to its short half-life, reversibility, ease of dose titration, and nonrenal dependent excretion. It is therefore not uncommon for an individual's anticoagulation management to require rapid changing from DOAC to UFH. Due to UFH's complex pharmacokinetics, including nonspecific binding to acute phase proteins and dose-dependent clearance, careful laboratory monitoring, generally with activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) or anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) activity, is necessary. When transitioning from a DOAC to UFH, overlapping pharmacologic effects can significantly interfere with coagulation assays, particularly if residual DOAC levels persist at the time UFH is initiated. DOACs can prolong the APTT and elevate anti-Xa activity, leading to overestimation of UFH activity, inappropriate dose adjustments, and increased risk of bleeding or thromboembolic events. Here, we examine the laboratory implications of transitioning from DOAC therapy to UFH, with a focus on the performance and interpretation of APTT and anti-Xa assays in the presence of residual DOAC levels and how to overcome the interference of DOAC in UFH monitoring. We suggest an algorithm to follow during this transition.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- How to deal with interference on heparin anti-Xa activity caused by oral factor FXa inhibitors: communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Control of AnticoagulationJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2025
- Standardization of Anti-Xa Assay and its Comparison with Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time for Monitoring Unfractionated Heparin TherapyIndian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2023
- Low molecular weight heparin anti-Xa assays can identify patients with clinically important apixaban and rivaroxaban drug levelsThrombosis Research, 2022
- The Relationship between the Initial Anti‐factor Xa Measurement and the Duration of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Influence in Patients Transitioning to HeparinPharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 2020
- Should we abandon the APTT for monitoring unfractionated heparin?Thrombosis Research, 2017
- Impact of the Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Activated Clotting TimeJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 2017
- The effect of the direct factor Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban on haemostasis tests: a comprehensive assessment using in vitro and ex vivo samplesPathology, 2016
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) in the Laboratory: 2015 ReviewThrombosis Research, 2015
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2014
- Using low molecular weight heparin in special patient populationsJournal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2009