New York as a Global Creative Hub: A Competitive Analysis of Four Theories on World Cities
Author:
- 1 November 2006
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Economic Development Quarterly
- Vol. 20 (4) , 330-350
Abstract
How New York City has maintained its position atop the global urban hierarchy as a leading player in the world and national economy is part of the broader discussion on why cities grow and why some remain at the top of the heap decade on decade. There are several dominant theories explaining New York City’s success, most notably those that argue the city is a center of command and control or managerial elite and is a global hub of finance and its related services. Yet an emerging framework explaining New York City’s dominant position argues for the importance of global creative centers. From an occupational analysis of these competing hypotheses emerges a picture of New York City as a great bastion of creativity and cultural and artistic production. These results provide a unique perspective on New York City’s position in the world hierarchy of cities and new opportunities for economic development strategies.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Urban Colossus: Why is New York America's Largest City?2005
- Targeting Occupations in Regional and Community Economic DevelopmentJournal of the American Planning Association, 2004
- The Ascendance of New York FashionInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2004
- The Competitive Foundations of Localized Learning and Innovation: The Case of Women's Garment Production in New York CityEconomic Geography, 2002
- The Local Innovation System as a Source of 'Variety': Openness and Adaptability in New York City's Garment DistrictRegional Studies, 2002
- A roster of world citiesCities, 1999
- World Cities in a World-System1995
- The world city hypothesis1995
- On the mechanics of economic developmentJournal of Monetary Economics, 1988
- A Contribution to the Theory of Economic GrowthThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1956