Attributing Sources of Variation in Patients’ Experiences of Ambulatory Care
Authors:
- Hector P. RodriguezHRHector P. Rodriguez
- John F. ScogginsJSJohn F. Scoggins
- Ted von GlahnTGTed von Glahn
- Alan M. ZaslavskyAZAlan M. Zaslavsky
- Dana Gelb ScD SafranDSDana Gelb ScD Safran
- 1 August 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 47 (8) , 835-841
Abstract
Background: Public reporting and pay-for-performance programs increasingly rely on patient experience data to evaluate individual physicians and guide quality improvement efforts. The extent to which performance variation is attributable to physicians versus other system-level units, however, remains unclear. Methods: Using ambulatory care experience survey data from 61,839 patients of 1729 primary care physicians in California (response rate = 39.1%), this study assesses the proportion of explainable performance variation attributable to various organizational units in composite measures of physician-patient interaction, organizational features of care, and global assessments of care. For each measure, multilevel regression models that controlled for respondent characteristics and used random effects to account for the clustering of patients within physicians, physicians within care sites, care sites within medical groups, and medical groups within primary care service areas, estimated the proportion of explainable performance variation attributable to each system-level unit. Results: System-level factors explained between 27.9% to 47.7% of variation, with the highest proportion explained for the access to care composite and the lowest explained for the quality of chronic care composite. Physicians accounted for the largest proportion of explainable variance for all measures (range: 35.1%–49.0%). Care sites and primary care service areas explained substantial proportions of variance (>20% each) for the access to care and care coordination measures. Medical groups explained the largest proportions of variation (>20%) for global assessments of care. Conclusions: Individual physicians and their care sites are the most important foci for patient experience improvement efforts. Because markets contribute substantially to performance variation on organizational features of care, future research should clarify the extent to which associated performance deficits are modifiable.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring Patients' Experiences With Individual Specialist Physicians and Their PracticesAmerican Journal of Medical Quality, 2008
- Patient Samples for Measuring Primary Care Physician PerformanceMedical Care, 2007
- Clinical Concerns About Clinical Performance MeasurementThe Annals of Family Medicine, 2007
- Measuring patients’ experiences with individual primary care physiciansJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2006
- Paying for PerformanceQuality Management in Health Care, 2005
- Plan, Geographical, and Temporal Variation of Consumer Assessments of Ambulatory Health CareHealth Services Research, 2004
- How Many Patients Are Needed to Provide Reliable Evaluations of Individual Clinicians?Medical Care, 2004
- Physician Clinical Performance AssessmentJAMA, 2003
- Patient Reports and Ratings of Individual Physicians: An Evaluation of the DoctorGuide and Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study Provider-Level SurveysAmerican Journal of Medical Quality, 2003
- The Unreliability of Individual Physician "Report Cards" for Assessing the Costs and Quality of Care of a Chronic DiseaseJAMA, 1999