A large-scale empirical study of configurations, errors, and warnings for compilation in continuous integration
- 30 January 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Empirical Software Engineering
- Vol. 31 (3) , 64
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62302327)
- Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20230478)
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the usage, co-usage and migration of CI/CD tools: A qualitative analysisEmpirical Software Engineering, 2023
- An empirical characterization of bad practices in continuous integrationEmpirical Software Engineering, 2020
- Automated Reporting of Anti-Patterns and Decay in Continuous Integration2019
- Precise Condition Synthesis for Program Repair2017
- Why Do Automated Builds Break? An Empirical Study2014
- SemFix: Program repair via semantic analysis2013
- A systematic study of automated program repair: Fixing 55 out of 105 bugs for $8 each2012
- A Hundred Days of Continuous Integration2008
- Empirical analysis on the correlation between GCC compiler warnings and revision numbers of source files in five industrial software projectsEmpirical Software Engineering, 2006
- Qualitative methods in empirical studies of software engineeringIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1999