Comparative cranial biomechanics reveal macroevolutionary trends in theropod dinosaurs, with emphasis on Tyrannosauroidea
Open Access
- 27 January 2026
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Anatomical Record
- Vol. 309 (11) , 3036-3076
Abstract
Tyrannosaurus is viewed as a model organism in vertebrate paleontology, with numerous studies analyzing its feeding biomechanics. Nonetheless, the evolution of this feeding performance has been under‐addressed in Tyrannosauroidea, especially in basal tyrannosauroids. Here we used muscle‐force reconstruction and finite element analysis (FEA) to quantify the cranial performance of tyrannosauroids and outgroup theropod clades. 2D (planar) cranial models, set to standardized skull lengths and jaw adductor forces, were used to analyze the evolution of feeding behavior in a large sample size of Tyrannosauroidea and other theropods. Sampled stresses matched well between planar and 3D analyses of three disparately shaped crania, suggesting valid interpretations from 2D models along the lateral sides of theropod crania if symmetrical bite loadings are assumed. We traced cranial evolution by sampling stresses at homologous points of theropod crania and input their average stress values into a maximum likelihood ancestral character state estimation. Our results show tyrannosauroids having moderate‐to‐low cranial stresses. We further tested whether the average stress value correlates with head size through phylogenetic generalized least square regressions. We found that 2D FEA provides significant information on the evolution of feeding performance in a major dinosaur clade. Along internal branches of Tyrannosauroidea, hypothetical common ancestors exhibit low cranial stress values owing to a combination of robust skulls and cranial protuberances. These traits may have been passed down to later tyrannosauroids, enabling them to handle high forces. Our results additionally demonstrate a possible correlation between cranial shape (brevirostrine versus longirostrine) and inferred cranial performance in non‐tyrannosauroid clades.Keywords
Funding Information
- Jurassic Foundation
This publication has 148 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative cranial biomechanics reveal that Late Cretaceous tyrannosaurids exerted relatively greater bite force than in early‐diverging tyrannosauroidsThe Anatomical Record, 2023
- Neurosensory and Sinus Evolution as Tyrannosauroid Dinosaurs Developed Giant Size: Insight from the Endocranial Anatomy of Bistahieversor sealeyiThe Anatomical Record, 2020
- Palatal Biomechanics and Its Significance for Cranial Kinesis in Tyrannosaurus rexThe Anatomical Record, 2019
- Free body analysis, beam mechanics, and finite element modeling of the mandible of Alligator mississippiensisJournal of Morphology, 2011
- New Insights Into Dinosaur Jaw Muscle AnatomyThe Anatomical Record, 2009
- The Facial Integument of Centrosaurine Ceratopsids: Morphological and Histological Correlates of Novel Skin StructuresThe Anatomical Record, 2009
- Functional variation of neck muscles and their relation to feeding style in Tyrannosauridae and other large theropod dinosaursThe Anatomical Record, 2007
- Biomechanics of the rostrum in crocodilians: A comparative analysis using finite‐element modelingThe Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology, 2006
- Forelimb biomechanics of nonavian theropod dinosaurs in predationSenckenbergiana lethaea, 2002
- Competition1989