A decision framework to integrate in-situ and ex-situ management for species in the European Union
Authors:
- Johanna StaerkJSJohanna Staerk
- Fernando ColcheroFCFernando Colchero
- Melissa A. KenneyMKMelissa A. Kenney
- Kerrie A. WilsonKWKerrie A. Wilson
- Wendy B. FodenWFWendy B. Foden
- Jamie A. CarrJCJamie A. Carr
- Zjef PereboomZPZjef Pereboom
- Lucie BlandLBLucie Bland
- Nate FlesnessNFNate Flesness
- Tara MartinTMTara Martin
- Luigi MaioranoLMLuigi Maiorano
- Julia E. FaJFJulia E. Fa
Open Access
- 11 January 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Conservation Science
- Vol. 4, 1298850
Abstract
Zoos and aquaria in the European Union (EU) can play a crucial role in the conservation of EU species, as they currently hold nearly half (49%) of EU terrestrial vertebrates. In this study, we analyzed the species composition and population sizes of EU zoos and developed a framework to prioritize recommendations for additional ex-situ and in-situ interventions for 277 at-risk EU species. Our results showed that EU zoos currently hold 39% of threatened EU species, 27% of EU endemic species, 62% of EU species vulnerable to climate change, 20% of EU species listed by the Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE), 25% of Evolutionary Distinct and Globally Endangered (EDGE) EU species, while only 5% are subject to ex-situ conservation. Using our framework, we found that additional captive breeding was recommended for 60-61%% of species while expanding protected areas was recommended for only 2–22%, as 217 out of 277 species already met habitat protection targets. Both interventions were recommended for up to 20% of species, while the remaining 18% required no interventions because captive populations and habitat protection fully met targets. Our flexible framework can support more effective integrated conservation planning decisions for EU species and help identify target species for further in-depth assessment by the IUCN Ex-situ guidelines.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Generation length for mammalsNature Conservation, 2013
- How to Decide Whether to Move Species Threatened by Climate ChangePLOS ONE, 2013
- Identifying the World's Most Climate Change Vulnerable Species: A Systematic Trait-Based Assessment of all Birds, Amphibians and CoralsPLOS ONE, 2013
- Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declinesBiological Conservation, 2013
- Optimal Allocation of Resources among Threatened Species: a Project Prioritization ProtocolConservation Biology, 2009
- Sustaining the Ark: the challenges faced by zoos in maintaining viable populationsInternational Zoo Yearbook, 2009
- Converting Endangered Species Categories to Probabilities of Extinction for Phylogenetic Conservation PrioritizationPLOS ONE, 2008
- Use and misuse of the IUCN Red List Criteria in projecting climate change impacts on biodiversityGlobal Change Biology, 2006
- Conflicts and Choices in Biodiversity PreservationJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1998
- Designing the Ark: Setting Priorities for Captive BreedingConservation Biology, 1996