Evaluating TESLA-G, a gamified, telegram-delivered, quizzing platform for surgical education in medical students: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
Authors:
- Matthew Song Peng NgMNMatthew Song Peng Ng
- Ahmad Ishqi JabirAJAhmad Ishqi Jabir
- Tony De Rong NgTNTony De Rong Ng
- Darren Ngiap Hao TanDTDarren Ngiap Hao Tan
- James LeeJLJames Lee
- Dinesh Carl Junis MahendranDMDinesh Carl Junis Mahendran
- Lorainne Tudor CarLCLorainne Tudor Car
- Clement Luck Khng ChiaCCClement Luck Khng Chia
Open Access
Abstract
Introduction Online multiple-choice question (MCQ) quizzes are popular in medical education due to their ease of access and ability for test-enhanced learning. However, a general lack of motivation among students often results in decreasing usage over time. We aim to address this limitation by developing Telegram Education for Surgical Learning and Application Gamified (TESLA-G), an online platform for surgical education that incorporates game elements into conventional MCQ quizzes. Methods and analysis This online, pilot randomised control trial will be conducted over 2 weeks. Fifty full-time undergraduate medical students from a medical school in Singapore will be recruited and randomised into an intervention group (TESLA-G) and an active control group (non-gamified quizzing platform) with a 1:1 allocation ratio, stratified by year of study. We will evaluate TESLA-G in the area of endocrine surgery education. Our platform is designed based on Bloom’s taxonomy of learning domains: questions are created in blocks of five questions per endocrine surgery topic, with each question corresponding to one level on Bloom’s taxonomy. This structure promotes mastery while boosting student engagement and motivation. All questions are created by two board-certified general surgeons and one endocrinologist, and validated by the research team. The feasibility of this pilot study will be determined quantitatively by participant enrolment, participant retention and degree of completion of the quizzes. The acceptability of the intervention will be assessed quantitatively by a postintervention learner satisfaction survey consisting of a system satisfaction questionnaire and a content satisfaction questionnaire. The improvement of surgical knowledge will be assessed by comparing the scores of preintervention and postintervention knowledge tests, which consist of separately created questions on endocrine surgery. Retention of surgical knowledge will be measured using a follow-up knowledge test administered 2 weeks postintervention. Finally, qualitative feedback from participants regarding their experience will be obtained and thematically analysed. Ethics and dissemination This research is approved by Singapore Nanyang Technological University (NTU) Institutional Review Boards (Reference Number: IRB-2021-732). All participants will be expected to read and sign a letter of informed consent before they are considered as recruited into the study. This study poses minimal risk to participants. Study results will be published in peer-reviewed open-access journals and presented in conference presentations. Trial registration number NCT05520671.Keywords
Funding Information
- Games for Health Innovations Centre (SGG20/SN02)
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing the Students’ Evaluations of Educational Quality (SEEQ) questionnaire in Greek higher educationHigher Education, 2014
- Gamification as a tool for enhancing graduate medical educationPostgraduate Medical Journal, 2014
- Increasing Student Success Using Online Quizzing in Introductory (Majors) BiologyCBE—Life Sciences Education, 2013
- Test‐enhanced learning in medical educationMedical Education, 2008
- Use of unsupervised online quizzes as formative assessment in a medical physiology course: effects of incentives on student participation and performanceAdvances in Physiology Education, 2007
- Test-Enhanced LearningPsychological Science, 2006
- Using thematic analysis in psychologyQualitative Research in Psychology, 2006
- A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An OverviewTheory Into Practice, 2002
- The Evaluation of the Student Evaluation of Educational Quality Questionnaire (SEEQ) in UK Higher EducationAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2001
- SEEQ: A RELIABLE, VALID, AND USEFUL INSTRUMENT FOR COLLECTING STUDENTS' EVALUATIONS OF UNIVERSITY TEACHINGBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982