Phylogeny of the microcormorants, with the description of a new genus
Authors:
- Martyn KennedyMKMartyn Kennedy
- Alexander T SalisASAlexander T Salis
- Sampath S SeneviratneSSSampath S Seneviratne
- Dilini RathnayakeDRDilini Rathnayake
- Lisa J NupenLNLisa J Nupen
- Peter G RyanPRPeter G Ryan
- Stefano VolponiSVStefano Volponi
- Pascale LubbePLPascale Lubbe
- Nicolas J RawlenceNRNicolas J Rawlence
- Hamish G SpencerHSHamish G Spencer
Open Access
- 27 June 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
- Vol. 199 (1) , 310-317
Abstract
The aptly named microcormorants (currently placed in the genus Microcarbo) form a morphologically diminutive and distinct clade sister to all other living cormorants and shags. However, the relationships within Microcarbo are largely speculative. Sequence data resolve these relationships unambiguously, with our phylogeny suggesting that the microcormorants separated from the other cormorants ~16 Mya and showing that the two African species [the reed (or long-tailed) cormorant, Microcarbo africanus, and the crowned cormorant, Microcarbo coronatus] are closely related sister taxa, forming a clade that diverged from the other microcormorants ~12 Mya. The deep split between the African microcormorants and the others is considerably older than many well-recognized generic splits within the cormorants (e.g. Leucocarbo and Phalacrocorax). Thus, we suggest that the African microcormorants warrant their own genus, and we erect Afrocarbo, with type species Pelecanus africanus. Within the reduced Microcarbo, we estimate that the little pied cormorant (Microcarbo melanoleucos of Australasia) separated from the sister pair of the Javanese and pygmy cormorants (respectively, Microcarbo niger from south/southeast Asia and Microcarbo pygmaeus from Europe) ~9 Mya and that the latter two species split ~2 Mya. Given the age of these splits, the microcormorants appear to represent another example of morphological conservatism in the Suliformes.Keywords
Funding Information
- Department of Wildlife Conservation of Sri Lanka (WL/3/2/41/14)
- Universityof CapeTown (2009/V21/LN)
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can Foraging Ecology Drive the Evolution of Body Size in a Diving Endotherm?PLOS ONE, 2013
- MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice Across a Large Model SpaceSystematic Biology, 2012
- Evolution of Modern Birds Revealed by Mitogenomics: Timing the Radiation and Origin of Major OrdersMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2011
- New Algorithms and Methods to Estimate Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies: Assessing the Performance of PhyML 3.0Systematic Biology, 2010
- Patterns and processes of diversification in a widespread and ecologically diverse avian group, the buteonine hawks (Aves, Accipitridae)Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2009
- A Phylogenomic Study of Birds Reveals Their Evolutionary HistoryScience, 2008
- Phylogeography of Kauri Snails and their allies from Northland, New Zealand (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Rhytididae: Paryphantinae)Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2006
- Phylogenies of the Frigatebirds (Fregatidae) and Tropicbirds (Phaethonidae), two divergent groups of the traditional order Pelecaniformes, inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequencesMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2004
- Foraging Behaviour in Four Sympatric CormorantsJournal of Animal Ecology, 1988
- Confidence Limits on Phylogenies: An Approach Using the BootstrapEvolution, 1985