Low Rectal Cancers at Initial Staging MRI
- 1 November 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in RadioGraphics
- Vol. 43 (11) , e230080
Abstract
Low rectal cancers, which are associated with increased risk of local recurrent disease and poorer prognosis, have unique anatomic considerations and issues for staging and treatment that do not apply to mid and high rectal cancers. Although tumor histology help drive the staging and treatment of all rectal cancers, it is of particular importance in low rectal cancers, which may involve the anal canal, to help establish whether a low rectal mass should be staged and treated as a rectal cancer (ie, adenocarcinoma) or an anal cancer (ie, squamous cell carcinoma). Optimal staging and treatment of rectal cancer are contingent on tumor location and local extent, which help guide management decisions including neoadjuvant therapy and curative surgical treatment strategies. Tumor location in the low rectum and local involvement of the anal canal, sphincter, and pelvic floor help determine whether a patient can undergo sphincter-preserving resection such as a low anterior resection versus abdominoperineal resection to achieve negative surgical margins. Issues exist related to the anatomy and patterns of disease spread that are unique to the low rectum and include how to determine and stage anal sphincter involvement, mesorectal fascia status at the pelvic floor, and nodal status of extramesorectal nodes such as the external iliac and inguinal lymph nodes. For these reasons, it is imperative that radiologists who interpret rectal cancer staging MRI examinations feel comfortable with the unique anatomy of the low rectum and anal canal, nuances of low rectal cancer local disease spread, and treatment paradigms for low rectal cancer. ©RSNA, 2023 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center. See the invited commentary by Gollub in this issue.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Detected Tumor Response for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Predicts Survival Outcomes: MERCURY ExperienceJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2011
- Is the 1-cm Rule of Distal Bowel Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Based on Clinical Evidence? A Systematic ReviewAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2011
- Lymph node distribution and pattern of metastases in the mesorectum following total mesorectal excision using the modified fat clearing techniqueJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2011
- Preoperative High-resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Identify Good Prognosis Stage I, II, and III Rectal Cancer Best Managed by Surgery AloneAnnals of Surgery, 2011
- Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2010
- Surgical outcomes for colon and rectal cancer over a decade: results from a consecutive monocentric experience in 902 unselected patientsWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2007
- Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational studyBMJ, 2006
- Distribution of metastatic lymph nodes in colorectal cancer by the modified clearing methodDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1994
- The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence?British Journal of Surgery, 1982
- The importance of the perianal connective tissue in the surgical anatomy and function of the anusDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1977