Web-based interpretation bias training to reduce anxiety: A sequential, multiple-assignment randomized trial.
Authors:
- Jeremy W. EberleJEJeremy W. Eberle
- Katharine E. DanielKDKatharine E. Daniel
- Sonia BaeeSBSonia Baee
- Alexandra L. SilvermanASAlexandra L. Silverman
- Elijah LewisELElijah Lewis
- Anna N. BaglioneABAnna N. Baglione
- Alexandra WerntzAWAlexandra Werntz
- Noah J. FrenchNFNoah J. French
- Julie L. JiJJJulie L. Ji
- Nicola HohenseeNHNicola Hohensee
- Xin TongXTXin Tong
- Jacalyn M. HubandJHJacalyn M. Huband
- 1 June 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Vol. 92 (6) , 367-384
Abstract
Web-based cognitive bias modification for interpretation (CBM-I) can improve interpretation biases and anxiety symptoms but faces high rates of dropout. This study tested the effectiveness of web-based CBM-I relative to an active psychoeducation condition and the addition of low-intensity telecoaching for a subset of CBM-I participants. 1,234 anxious community adults (Mage = 35.09 years, 81.2% female, 72.1% white, 82.6% not Hispanic) were randomly assigned at Stage 1 of a sequential, multiple-assignment randomized trial to complete five weekly sessions of CBM-I or psychoeducation on our team's public research website. After the first session, for Stage 2, an algorithm attempted to classify CBM-I participants as higher (vs. lower) risk for dropping out; those classified as higher risk were then randomly assigned to complete four brief weekly telecoaching check-ins (vs. no coaching). As hypothesized (https://doi.org/j2xr; Daniel, Eberle, & Teachman, 2020), CBM-I significantly outperformed psychoeducation at improving positive and negative interpretation biases (Recognition Ratings, Brief Body Sensations Interpretation Questionnaire) and anxiety symptoms (Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale, Anxiety Scale from Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-Short Form), with smaller treatment gains remaining significant at 2-month follow-up. Unexpectedly, CBM-I had significantly worse treatment dropout outcomes than psychoeducation, and adding coaching (vs. no coaching) did not significantly improve efficacy or dropout outcomes (notably, many participants chose not to interact with their coach). Web-based CBM-I appears effective, but supplemental coaching may not mitigate the challenge of dropout. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH113752)
This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit:
- Online cognitive bias modification for interpretation to reduce anxious thinking during the COVID-19 pandemicBehaviour Research and Therapy, 2023
- Multi-session online interpretation bias training for anxiety in a community sampleBehaviour Research and Therapy, 2021
- The promise of machine learning in predicting treatment outcomes in psychiatryWorld Psychiatry, 2021
- Treatment gap for anxiety disorders is global: Results of the World Mental Health Surveys in 21 countriesDepression and Anxiety, 2018
- Addressing the treatment gap: A key challenge for extending evidence-based psychosocial interventionsBehaviour Research and Therapy, 2017
- Effect of a Web-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Insomnia Intervention With 1-Year Follow-upJAMA Psychiatry, 2017
- A randomized controlled trial on the role of support in Internet-based problem solving therapy for depression and anxietyBehaviour Research and Therapy, 2015
- Twelve‐month and lifetime prevalence and lifetime morbid risk of anxiety and mood disorders in the United StatesInternational Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 2012
- Internet-based treatment of social phobia: A randomized controlled trial comparing unguided with two types of guided self-helpBehaviour Research and Therapy, 2011
- Development and validation of an Overall Anxiety Severity And Impairment Scale (OASIS)Depression and Anxiety, 2006