Analyzing the Sensitivity of Vision Language Models in Visual Question Answering
Preprint
Abstract
We can think of Visual Question Answering as a (multimodal) conversation between a human and an AI system. Here, we explore the sensitivity of Vision Language Models (VLMs) through the lens of cooperative principles of conversation proposed by Grice. Specifically, even when Grice's maxims of conversation are flouted, humans typically do not have much difficulty in understanding the conversation even though it requires more cognitive effort. Here, we study if VLMs are capable of handling violations to Grice's maxims in a manner that is similar to humans. Specifically, we add modifiers to human-crafted questions and analyze the response of VLMs to these modifiers. We use three state-of-the-art VLMs in our study, namely, GPT-4o, Claude-3.5-Sonnet and Gemini-1.5-Flash on questions from the VQA v2.0 dataset. Our initial results seem to indicate that the performance of VLMs consistently diminish with the addition of modifiers which indicates our approach as a promising direction to understand the limitations of VLMs.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformers2019
- McNemar χ2test revisited: comparing sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic examinationsScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 2008
- Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence ComprehensionScience, 1996