Comparative pathogenicity of infectious bursal disease viruses of three different genotypes
- 14 June 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Microbial Pathogenesis
- Vol. 169, 105641
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mutations of Residues 249 and 256 in VP2 Are Involved in the Replication and Virulence of Infectious Bursal Disease VirusPLOS ONE, 2013
- Both Genome Segments Contribute to the Pathogenicity of Very Virulent Infectious Bursal Disease VirusJournal of Virology, 2013
- Complete Genome Sequence Analysis of a Natural Reassortant Infectious Bursal Disease Virus in ChinaJournal of Virology, 2012
- Different Domains of the RNA Polymerase of Infectious Bursal Disease Virus Contribute to VirulencePLOS ONE, 2012
- Differentiation of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) genome segment B of very virulent and classical lineage by RT-PCR amplification and restriction enzyme analysisArchives of Virology, 2011
- ElliPro: a new structure-based tool for the prediction of antibody epitopesBMC Bioinformatics, 2008
- The 2.6-Angstrom Structure of Infectious Bursal Disease Virus-Derived T=1 Particles Reveals New Stabilizing Elements of the Virus CapsidJournal of Virology, 2006
- The Birnavirus Crystal Structure Reveals Structural Relationships among Icosahedral VirusesCell, 2005
- VP1, the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and genome-linked protein of infectious bursal disease virus, interacts with the carboxy-terminal domain of translational eukaryotic initiation factor 4AIIArchives of Virology, 2004
- Replication of infectious bursal disease virus in lymphoid cellsArchives of Virology, 1986