The impact of lifespan assumptions in LCA: Comparing the replacement of building parts versus building layers—A housing case study
Authors:
- Annette DavisADAnnette Davis
- Alberto Quintana-GallardoAQAlberto Quintana-Gallardo
- Núria Martí AudíNANúria Martí Audí
- Ignacio Guillén GuillamónIGIgnacio Guillén Guillamón
- 15 November 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Energy and Buildings
- Vol. 326
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- European Commission Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Embodied GHG emissions of buildings – The hidden challenge for effective climate change mitigationApplied Energy, 2020
- Benchmarks for environmental impact of housing in Europe: Definition of archetypes and LCA of the residential building stockBuilding and Environment, 2018
- Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: A review and critique of current industry practiceEnergy and Buildings, 2017
- The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodologyThe International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016
- Design of a multipurpose “zero energy consumption” building according to European Directive 2010/31/EU: Life cycle assessmentEnergy and Buildings, 2014
- Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: Guiding the optimization of conventional Italian buildingsEnergy and Buildings, 2013
- Developing an LCA methodology to account for the environmental benefits of design for deconstructionBuilding and Environment, 2012
- Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modulesEnergy and Buildings, 2012
- An assessment tool for the energy, economic and environmental evaluation of thermal insulation solutionsEnergy and Buildings, 2009
- Benchmarks for sustainable constructionEnergy and Buildings, 2005