Instructor Feedback: How Much Do Students Really Want?
- 19 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Marketing Education
- Vol. 32 (2) , 172-181
Abstract
Marketing students expect feedback on papers and assignments; and many professors expend much time and effort providing individualized and substantive comments in response to student work. Doing so is challenging and time consuming when faced with large class sizes, high student—faculty ratios, and communications-intensive courses. Furthermore, instructors observe that though students often express desire for feedback, some do not appear to use it. The results of this study suggest that when an instructor provides a lot of feedback, as opposed to a small amount of feedback on an assignment, students receive it negatively. The results also suggest that students respond no more positively than when offered no feedback comments at all. Results suggest that if an instructor wants students to be receptive to the feedback provided because they believe it is fair, because they like the instructor, or because they feel the instructor has a positive impression of them, the instructor should provide only a modest amount of feedback or a moderate number of clear and specific feedback comments. Alternatively, an instructor who wants to offer students a greater amount of feedback needs to allow them to revise and resubmit their assignments.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differing perceptions in the feedback processStudies in Higher Education, 2006
- How Many Choices Are Good? Measurement of the Effects of Course Choice on Perceptions of a Marketing OptionJournal of Marketing Education, 2006
- Instructor, Student, and Employer Perceptions on Preparing Marketing Students for Changing Business LandscapesJournal of Marketing Education, 2003
- Enhancing Student Motivation in Marketing Classes: Using Student Management GroupsJournal of Marketing Education, 2002
- The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learningStudies in Higher Education, 2002
- Successful and Unsuccessful Sales Calls: Measuring Salesperson Attributions and Behavioral IntentionsJournal of Marketing, 2001
- The relationship of student‐faculty out‐of‐class communication to instructor immediacy and trust and to student motivationCommunication Education, 1999
- ENHANCING AND UNDERMINING INTRINSIC MOTIVATION: THE EFFECTS OF TASK‐INVOLVING AND EGO‐INVOLVING EVALUATION ON INTEREST AND PERFORMANCEBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 1988
- The Functions of AttributionsSocial Psychology Quarterly, 1980
- From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception1965