Pre-trial inter-laboratory analytical validation of the FOCUS4 personalised therapy trial
Open Access
- 7 September 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Vol. 69 (1) , 35-41
Abstract
Introduction: Molecular characterisation of tumours is increasing personalisation of cancer therapy, tailored to an individual and their cancer. FOCUS4 is a molecularly stratified clinical trial for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. During an initial 16-week period of standard first-line chemotherapy, tumour tissue will undergo several molecular assays, with the results used for cohort allocation, then randomisation. Laboratories in Leeds and Cardiff will perform the molecular testing. The results of a rigorous pre-trial inter-laboratory analytical validation are presented and discussed. Methods: Wales Cancer Bank supplied FFPE tumour blocks from 97 mCRC patients with consent for use in further research. Both laboratories processed each sample according to an agreed definitive FOCUS4 laboratory protocol, reporting results directly to the MRC Trial Management Group for independent cross-referencing. Results: Pyrosequencing analysis of mutation status at KRAS codons12/13/61/146, NRAS codons12/13/61, BRAF codon600 and PIK3CA codons542/545/546/1047, generated highly concordant results. Two samples gave discrepant results; in one a PIK3CA mutation was detected only in Leeds, and in the other, a PIK3CA mutation was only detected in Cardiff. pTEN and mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) resulting in 6/97 discordant results for pTEN and 5/388 for MMR, resolved upon joint review. Tumour heterogeneity was likely responsible for pyrosequencing discrepancies. The presence of signet-ring cells, necrosis, mucin, edge-effects and over-counterstaining influenced IHC discrepancies. Conclusions: Pre-trial assay analytical validation is essential to ensure appropriate selection of patients for targeted therapies. This is feasible for both mutation testing and immunohistochemical assays and must be built into the workup of such trials. Trial registration number: ISRCTN90061564.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Panitumumab–FOLFOX4 Treatment and RAS Mutations in Colorectal CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- Addition of cetuximab to oxaliplatin-based first-line combination chemotherapy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trialThe Lancet, 2011
- KRAS and BRAF Mutations in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Are Associated With Poor Prognosis but Do Not Preclude Benefit From Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan: Results From the MRC FOCUS TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- PTEN Expression and KRAS Mutations on Primary Tumors and Metastases in the Prediction of Benefit From Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Wild-Type BRAF Is Required for Response to Panitumumab or Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- K-rasMutations and Benefit from Cetuximab in Advanced Colorectal CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Wild-Type KRAS Is Required for Panitumumab Efficacy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Mutations in the RAS‐MAPK, PI(3)K (phosphatidylinositol‐3‐OH kinase) signaling network correlate with poor survival in a population‐based series of colon cancersInternational Journal of Cancer, 2008
- PTEN loss of expression predicts cetuximab efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer patientsBritish Journal of Cancer, 2007
- KRAS Mutation Status Is Predictive of Response to Cetuximab Therapy in Colorectal CancerCancer Research, 2006