Practice variation of genetic counselor engagement in the cystic fibrosis newborn screen‐positive diagnostic resolution process
- 24 September 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Vol. 28 (6) , 1178-1188
Abstract
Families of infants with a positive newborn screen for cystic fibrosis (CFNBS+) have well‐characterized genetic counseling needs, including understanding the implications of diagnostic categorization. However, degree of involvement of genetic counselors (GCs) in the CFNBS+ diagnostic resolution process varies. This project explored GC engagement with US CF care centers in the diagnostic resolution process for CFNBS+ infants. Surveys were emailed to 713 Cystic Fibrosis Foundation‐accredited CF center directors and clinic coordinators and 4,517 GCs. Respondents from institutions providing CFNBS+ diagnostic resolution were categorized by level of engagement between the CF center and GC: GC is part of or embedded in CF center (GC‐engaged); GC is independent of CF center but receives CFNBS+ referrals (GC‐referral); GC is uninvolved (non‐engaged)] in CF center or CFNBS+ diagnostic resolution process. Responses from 125 CF center directors and clinic coordinators (17.5%) and 174 GCs (3.8%) were received. Analysis targeted responses from 84 center directors and clinic coordinators and 52 GCs, estimated to represent 24%–48% and 29% of 175 pediatric CF care centers, respectively. Nearly 40% of CF center directors or clinic coordinators never refer CFNBS+ infants to GCs. Respondents from GC‐engaged CF centers reported that GCs provide unique and valuable services, understand CF at a high level, improve efficiency of the CFNBS+ diagnostic resolution process, and should be part of the CF care team; respondents from non‐engaged CF centers reported negative views of GCs’ value and knowledge (all p < .05). GCs engaged with CF centers were more likely to report that their services were valued by and accessible to CF centers (both p < .05). At all levels of engagement with CF centers, GCs were comfortable discussing CF genotype–phenotype correlation, variants of unknown significance, quality of life, and therapies. These results highlight a need to address practice variation in CFNBS+ genetic counseling and improve access to GCs’ services.Keywords
Funding Information
- Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Technical report: ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of childrenGenetics in Medicine, 2013
- Informing parents about positive newborn screen resultsJournal of Child Health Care, 2012
- Parental Understanding of Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis After a Negative Sweat-TestPediatrics, 2011
- A Tailored Approach to Family‐Centered Genetic Counseling for Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening: The Wisconsin ModelJournal of Genetic Counseling, 2010
- Opportunities for quality improvement in cystic fibrosis newborn screeningJournal of Cystic Fibrosis, 2010
- Long‐term Evaluation of Genetic Counseling Following False‐Positive Newborn Screen for Cystic FibrosisJournal of Genetic Counseling, 2010
- Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Practice Guidelines for the Management of Infants with Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator-Related Metabolic Syndrome during the First Two Years of Life and BeyondThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2009
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2009
- A European consensus for the evaluation and management of infants with an equivocal diagnosis following newborn screening for cystic fibrosisJournal of Cystic Fibrosis, 2009
- Communications Systems and their Models: Massachusetts Parent Compliance with Recommended Specialty Care after Positive Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening ResultThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2005