Echosounders for fish detection disturb harbour porpoises
Authors:
- Jeroen HubertJHJeroen Hubert
- Benoît BergèsBBBenoît Bergès
- Clea ParcerisasCPClea Parcerisas
- Elisabeth DebusschereEDElisabeth Debusschere
- Joost A. C. de BruijnJBJoost A. C. de Bruijn
- Jozefien M. DemuynckJDJozefien M. Demuynck
- Carlota MuñizCMCarlota Muñiz
- Hans SlabbekoornHSHans Slabbekoorn
Preprint
Abstract
The marine world is an acoustic world that has become noisier with the increasing diversity and intensity of human activities at sea. The harbour porpoise ( Phocoena phocoena ) is one of the best-studied cetaceans regarding hearing and responses to human-made underwater sound. The species is most sensitive to high frequencies, yet most impact studies have focused on relatively low-frequency sources. As such, the effects of high frequency sonar – including echosounders – remain largely unstudied, despite their widespread use on vessels for depth sounding, fish or object detection, and seabed mapping. We investigated the effects of scientific echosounder use on harbour porpoise occurrence using 13 multi-sensor mooring deployments in the southern part of the North Sea. Moorings operated for an average of 57 days, with split-beam scientific echosounders active for an average of 51 days, for 10 minutes every hour (5 min at 70 kHz, followed by 5 min at either 185–255 kHz or 70 kHz again). Porpoise acoustic presence was continuously monitored with C/F-PODs and additionally validated with hydrophone detections at four of the locations. Across all 13 sites, detections declined by 65– 79% during echosounder transmissions and returned to typical levels within ∼30 minutes after the echosounder stopped pinging. Despite this relatively quick recovery, there was no indication of habituation, as responses did not diminish across observation periods over six weeks of hourly exposure. Spatial effects appeared local, as no deterrent effect was observed at 2.5 km from the source. We believe that our findings have important implications for studies that investigate both harbour porpoise and fish presence to understand predator-prey interactions, but they should also raise concern about the potentially cumulative impact on sensitive cetaceans from the wide use of relatively high frequency sonar in offshore practices.Keywords
All Related Versions
- Published version: Environmental Pollution, 391, 127569.
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sources of Underwater Noise2025
- Behavioral Responses to Underwater Noise2025
- Pseudoreplication of sound treatments in underwater exposure studiesAnimal Behaviour, 2024
- Harbour porpoises respond to recreational boats by speeding up and moving away from the boat pathEcology and Evolution, 2024
- Artisanal fishing, dolphins, and interactive pinger: A study from a passive acoustic perspectiveAquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 2021
- Effects of a seismic survey on movement of free-ranging Atlantic codCurrent Biology, 2021
- Ultra-High Foraging Rates of Harbor Porpoises Make Them Vulnerable to Anthropogenic DisturbanceCurrent Biology, 2016
- Towards a numerical model to simulate the observed displacement of harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena due to pile driving in Belgian watersHydrobiologia, 2014
- An Introduction to Underwater Acoustics2010
- Comparison of echolocation behaviour between coastal and riverine porpoisesDeep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 2007