Illusory Control
- 1 April 2009
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 20 (4) , 502-508
Abstract
Three experiments demonstrated that the experience of power leads to an illusion of personal control. Regardless of whether power was experientially primed ( Experiments 1 and 3 ) or manipulated through roles (manager vs. subordinate; Experiment 2 ), it led to perceived control over outcomes that were beyond the reach of the power holder. Furthermore, this illusory control mediated the influence of power on several self-enhancement and approach-related outcomes reported in the power literature, including optimism ( Experiment 2 ), self-esteem ( Experiment 3 ), and action orientation ( Experiment 3 ). These results demonstrate the theoretical importance of perceived control as a generative cause of and driving force behind many of power's far-reaching effects. A fourth experiment ruled out an alternative explanation: that positive mood, rather than illusory control, is at the root of power's effects. The discussion considers implications for existing and future research on the psychology of power, perceived control, and positive illusions.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lacking Control Increases Illusory Pattern PerceptionScience, 2008
- Power gained, power lostOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2008
- Power, Propensity to Negotiate, and Moving First in Competitive InteractionsPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2007
- Power, optimism, and risk‐takingEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2006
- Minority Status Decreases Sense of Control and Increases Interpretive ProcessingSocial Cognition, 2006
- Explaining the Premiums Paid for Large Acquisitions: Evidence of CEO HubrisAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1997
- Human agency in social cognitive theory.American Psychologist, 1989
- Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1978
- The illusion of control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975
- Power-Dependence RelationsAmerican Sociological Review, 1962