Physician Payment Contracts in the Presence of Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection: The Theory and Its Application in Ontario
- 4 August 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Health Economics
- Vol. 25 (10) , 1326-1340
Abstract
We develop a stylized principal–agent model with moral hazard and adverse selection to provide a unified framework for understanding some of the most salient features of the recent physician payment reform in Ontario and its impact on physician behavior. These features include the following: (i) physicians can choose a payment contract from a menu that includes an enhanced fee‐for‐service contract and a blended capitation contract; (ii) the capitation rate is higher, and the cost‐reimbursement rate is lower in the blended capitation contract; (iii) physicians sort selectively into the contracts based on their preferences; and (iv) physicians in the blended capitation model provide fewer services than physicians in the enhanced fee‐for‐service model. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimal Incentive Schemes for Altruistic ProvidersJournal of Public Economic Theory, 2013
- Enhanced fee-for-service model and physician productivity: Evidence from Family Health Groups in OntarioJournal of Health Economics, 2011
- Competition Among Health Plans: A Two‐Sided Market ApproachJournal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2010
- Capitation and enhanced fee-for-service models for primary care reform: a population-based evaluationCanadian Medical Association Journal, 2009
- The effect of financial incentives on gatekeeping doctors: Evidence from a natural experimentJournal of Health Economics, 2005
- Purchasing health care services from providers with unknown altruismJournal of Health Economics, 2005
- Propensity Score-Matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal StudiesReview of Economics and Statistics, 2002
- Evaluation of a three-step method for choosing the number of bootstrap repetitionsJournal of Econometrics, 2001
- Design-adaptive Nonparametric RegressionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1992
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983