Oncological results of full thoracoscopic major pulmonary resections for clinical Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer
Authors:
- 24 July 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 55 (2) , 263-270
Abstract
The full thoracoscopic approach to major pulmonary resections is considered challenging and controversial as it might compromise oncological outcomes. The aim of this work was to analyse the results of a full thoracoscopic technique in terms of nodal upstaging and survival in patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). All patients who underwent a full thoracoscopic major pulmonary resection for NSCLC between 2007 and August 2016 were analysed from an 'intent-to-treat' prospective database. Overall survival and disease-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier curves and comparisons in survival using the log-rank test. A total of 648 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 621 patients had clinical Stage I and 27 had higher stages (16 oligometastatic patients were excluded from the analysis, 11 cT3 or cT4). The mean follow-up was 34.5 months. There were 40 conversions to thoracotomy (6.3%). Thirty-day or in-hospital mortality was 0.95%. Complications occurred in 29.3% of patients. On pathological examination, 22.5% of clinical Stage I patients were upstaged. Nodal upstaging to N1 or N2 was observed in 15.8% of clinical Stage I patients. Five-year overall survival of the whole cohort was 75% and was significantly different between clinical Stages IA (76%) and IB (70.9%). For tumours <2 cm, no significant difference in overall survival was found for the segmentectomy group compared to the lobectomy group: 74% versus 78.9% (P = 0.634). Long-term survival is not compromised by a full thoracoscopic approach. Our results compared favourably with those of video-assisted techniques.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-Term Survival After Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Versus ThoracotomyThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2013
- Impact of Hospital Volume of Thoracoscopic Lobectomy on Primary Lung Cancer OutcomesThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2012
- Lobectomy in Octogenarians With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Ramifications of Increasing Life Expectancy and the Benefits of Minimally Invasive SurgeryThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2011
- Survival After Lobectomy Versus Segmentectomy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Population-Based AnalysisThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2011
- Lobectomy Versus Sublobar Resection for Small (2 cm or Less) Non–Small Cell Lung CancersThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2011
- A totally thoracoscopic approach for pulmonary anatomic segmentectomiesInteractive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, 2011
- Long-Term Survival After Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy for Primary Lung CancerThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2010
- Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancerThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2009
- Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy: Experience With 1,100 CasesThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2006
- Complete resection in lung cancer surgery: proposed definitionLung Cancer, 2005