High-Performance Membrane Dialyzers and Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients: A 2-Year Cohort Study from the Annual Survey of the Japanese Renal Data Registry
Authors:
- Takayuki HamanoTHTakayuki Hamano
- Atsushi WadaAWAtsushi Wada
- Shigeru NakaiSNShigeru Nakai
- Ikuto MasakaneIMIkuto Masakane
- 4 July 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in American Journal of Nephrology
- Vol. 46 (1) , 82-92
Abstract
Background: Little information is available regarding the type of dialyzer which results in good prognosis. This study is aimed at investigating the association between 7 types of dialyzers and 2-year mortality. Methods: We conducted a cohort study using data from a nationwide registry of the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. Subjects were 136,676 patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) between 2009 and 2011 who underwent maintenance HD for at least 2 years and were treated with one of the following 7 types of high-performance membrane dialyzers: cellulose triacetate (CTA), ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVAL), polyacrylonitrile (PAN), polyester polymer alloy (PEPA), polyethersulfone (PES), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and polysulfone (PS). Cox regression was used to estimate the association between baseline dialyzers and all-cause 2-year mortality, adjusting for potential confounders. Results: Data were adjusted using basic factors, with PS as a reference group, and the hazard ratio (HR) was significantly higher in CTA, PMMA, PAN, and EVAL groups. Further data adjustment for Kt/V yielded the same results as were obtained from data adjusted for basic factors. After further adjustment for nutrition- and inflammation-related factors, HR was significantly lowered for the PES and PMMA groups compared with the PS group (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.82-0.94 and HR 0.84 95% CI 0.76-0.93, respectively). After propensity score matching, HR for the PES and PMMA groups was significantly lowered compared with the PS group. Conclusions: The use of different membrane types may affect mortality. Further long-term prospective studies are needed to clarify whether the PES and PMMA membranes can improve prognosis.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Overview of Regular Dialysis Treatment in Japan (As of 31 December 2010)Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis, 2012
- Comparison of removal capacity of two consecutive generations of high-flux dialysers during different treatment modalitiesNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2011
- Effect of different synthetic membranes on laboratory parameters and survival in chronic haemodialysis patientsClinical Kidney Journal, 2010
- Role of Residual Kidney Function and Convective Volume on Change in β2-Microglobulin Levels in Hemodiafiltration PatientsClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2010
- Advantages of New Hemodialysis Membranes and EquipmentNephron Clinical Practice, 2009
- Bacteriological Water Quality in the Central Dialysis Fluid Delivery System from the Survey of the Japanese Society for Dialysis TherapyBlood Purification, 2009
- Effect of Membrane Permeability on Survival of Hemodialysis PatientsJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2009
- Determination of Kt/V and Protein Catabolic Rate Using Pre- and Postdialysis Blood Urea Nitrogen ConcentrationsNephron, 1994
- A new form of amyloid protein associated with chronic hemodialysis was identified as β2-microglobulinBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1985
- Effect of the Hemodialysis Prescription on Patient MorbidityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981