Annual variations in Nepalese seismicity: b-values and seismicity rates
Open Access
- 7 July 2025
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Geophysical Journal International
- Vol. 242 (3)
Abstract
SUMMARY: Seasonal variations in Nepalese seismicity have been reported with varying degrees of confidence. We re-investigate these claims by analysing 20 yr of Nepalese seismicity before the 2015 Gorkha earthquake, as detected by the Nepalese national network, and focusing on earthquakes located along the eastern and central sections of the Nepalese Main Himalayan Thrust. Using several declustering techniques, we find no statistically robust evidence of seasonal seismicity in the studied record, regardless of magnitude threshold above completeness. This suggests that previously reported seasonality may be restricted to the western section of the Nepalese orogeny, may be an artefact, or may indicate that nucleation times of earthquakes are longer than the year. We also investigate potential annual variations in the Gutenberg–Richter b-value, given its recent observed modulation by transient stressing. Additionally, we use large-scale mass redistribution estimated from the monthly gravity field retrieved from the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment and Follow-On (GRACE/-FO) missions, to resolve stress variations at depth induced by transient surface loads. We find that the mean annual b-value peaks when seasonal Coulomb stress rates reach their minimum value at the height of the summer rainy season. When considering the combined effect of tectonic and seasonal loading, this corresponds to a recurring period of stress reversal, when Coulomb stress momentarily decreases. This suggests that periodic clamping of the Main Himalayan Thrust reduces the likelihood of earthquakes growing to larger magnitudes in accordance with hierarchical rupture models. The susceptibility of b-value to stress variations of roughly 0.1 points.kPa$^{-1}$ is consistent with recent estimates of b-value sensitivity to transient loading, although it remains high when compared to the stress-dependence associated with both static differential stress, and with long-term evolution during the seismic cycle. This discrepancy points to the large impact of stress transients on the dynamics of seismic rupture.Keywords
This publication has 78 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comment on “An Assessment of the ICE‐6G_C (VM5a) Glacial Isostatic Adjustment Model” by Purcell et al.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2018
- Observations and Modeling of Coseismic and Postseismic Deformation Due To the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha (Nepal) EarthquakeJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2017
- The onset of laboratory earthquakes explained by nucleating rupture on a rate‐and‐state faultJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2016
- Multifrequential periodogram analysis of earthquake occurrence: An alternative approach to the Schuster spectrum, with two examples in central CaliforniaJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2015
- Possible seasonality in large deep‐focus earthquakesGeophysical Research Letters, 2015
- Interseismic coupling on the main Himalayan thrustGeophysical Research Letters, 2015
- On the stress dependence of the earthquake b valueGeophysical Research Letters, 2015
- Space geodesy constrains ice age terminal deglaciation: The global ICE‐6G_C (VM5a) modelJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2014
- Modeling deformation induced by seasonal variations of continental water in the Himalaya region: Sensitivity to Earth elastic structureJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2014
- Horizontal motion in elastic response to seasonal loading of rain water in the Amazon Basin and monsoon water in Southeast Asia observed by GPS and inferred from GRACEGeophysical Research Letters, 2013