Baseline resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors fails to predict virologic response to combination therapy in children (PACTG 338)
Authors:
- Susan A FiscusSFSusan A Fiscus
- Andrea KovacsAKAndrea Kovacs
- Leslie A PetchLPLeslie A Petch
- Chengcheng HuCHChengcheng Hu
- Andrew A WizniaAWAndrew A Wiznia
- Lynne M MofensonLMLynne M Mofenson
- Ram YogevRYRam Yogev
- Kenneth McIntoshKMKenneth McIntosh
- Stephen I PeltonSPStephen I Pelton
- Sonia NapravnikSNSonia Napravnik
- Kenneth StanleyKSKenneth Stanley
- Sharon A NachmanSNSharon A Nachman
Open Access
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in AIDS Research and Therapy
- Vol. 4 (1) , 2
Abstract
The association between baseline drug resistance mutations and subsequent increase in viral failure has not been established for HIV-infected children. We evaluated drug resistance mutations at 39 codon sites (21 protease inhibitor (PI) resistant codons and 18 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistant codons) for 92 clinically stable NRTI-experienced, PI-naive HIV-infected children 2 to 17 years of age who were initiating new therapy with ritonavir plus zidovudine (ZDV) and lamivudine or plus stavudine. The association between baseline drug resistance mutations and subsequent viral failure after 12 and 24 weeks of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was studied. There were few primary PI associated mutations in this PI-naïve population, but 84% had NRTI mutations – codons 215 (66%), 41 (42%), 67 (37%), 210 (33%) and 70 (32%). None of the specific baseline drug resistance mutations were associated with a higher rate of virologic failure after 12 or 24 weeks of HAART. Median week 12 viral load decreased as the total number of NRTI mutations at baseline increased (P = 0.006). Specifically, a higher level of baseline ZDV resistance mutation was associated with a decrease in viral failure after 12 weeks on a ZDV-containing HAART regimen (P = 0.017). No increase was seen in the rate of viral failure after HAART associated with the presence of resistance mutations at baseline. This paradoxical result may be due to adherence, replicative capacity, or ZDV hypersusceptibility to the new regimen.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Antiretroviral drug resistance among HIV‐1 infected children failing treatmentJournal of Medical Virology, 2002
- Genotypic Testing for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug ResistanceClinical Microbiology Reviews, 2002
- Analysis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance in Children Receiving Nucleoside Analogue Reverse‐Transcriptase Inhibitors plus Nevirapine, Nelfinavir, or Ritonavir (Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group 377)The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease Genotype Predicts Immune and Viral Responses to Combination Therapy with Protease Inhibitors (PIs) in PI‐Naive PatientsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Nucleoside Analogs Plus Ritonavir in Stable Antiretroviral Therapy–Experienced HIV-Infected ChildrenA Randomized Controlled TrialJAMA, 2000
- Attaining higher goals in HIV treatment: the central importance of adherence.1999
- Drug-resistance genotyping in HIV-1 therapy: the VIRAD APT randomi sed controlled trialThe Lancet, 1999
- Zidovudine Therapy and HIV Type 1 Mutations in Children with Symptomatic HIV Type 1 Infection: Effect of Switching to Didanosine or Zidovudine Plus Didanosine TherapyAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 1998
- Viral Load and Disease Progression in Infants Infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1New England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- The Relationship between Serum Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV‐1) RNA Level, CD4 Lymphocyte Percent, and Long‐Term Mortality Risk in HIV‐1—Infected ChildrenThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1997