Practice Guideline for the Surveillance of Patients After Curative Treatment of Colon and Rectal Cancer

Authors:
  • GCGeorge J. Chang
    George J. Chang
  • SHSamantha Hendren
    Samantha Hendren
  • MWMarty Weiser
    Marty Weiser
  • JIJennifer Irani
    Jennifer Irani
  • WBW. Donald Buie
    W. Donald Buie
  • JRJanice F. Rafferty
    Janice F. Rafferty
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Current evidence suggests improved rates of curative secondary treatment following identification of recurrence among patients who participate in a surveillance program after initial curative resection of colon or rectal cancer. The newer data show that surveillance CEA, chest and liver imaging,and colonoscopy can also improve survival through early diagnosis of recurrence; thus, these modalities are now included in the current guideline. Although the optimum strategy of surveillance for office visits, CEA, chest and liver imaging, and colonoscopy is not yet defined, routine surveillance does improve the detection of recurrence that can be resected with curative intent. Recommended surveillance schedules are shown in Table 4. However, the factors to be considered when recommending surveillance include underlying risk for recurrence, patient comorbidity, and the ability to tolerate major surgery to resect recurrent disease or palliative chemotherapy, performance status, physiologic age, preference, and compliance. The success of surveillance for early detection of curable recurrence will depend on patient and provider involvement to adhere to the surveillance schedule and avoid unnecessary examination. It should be noted that, after curative resection of colorectal cancer, patients are still at risk for other common malignancies(lung, breast, cervix, prostate) for which standard screening recommendations should be observed and measures to maintain general health (risk reduction for cardiovascular disease, eg, cessation of smoking, control of blood pressure and diabetes mellitus, balanced diet, regular exercise and sleep, and flu vaccines) should be recommended.

This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit: