Characteristics and outcomes of patients with advanced sarcoma enrolled in early phase immunotherapy trials
Authors:
- Roman GroisbergRGRoman Groisberg
- David S. HongDHDavid S. Hong
- Amini BehrangABAmini Behrang
- Kenneth HessKHKenneth Hess
- Filip JankuFJFilip Janku
- Sarina Piha-PaulSPSarina Piha-Paul
- Aung NaingANAung Naing
- Siqing FuSFSiqing Fu
- Robert BenjaminRBRobert Benjamin
- Shreyaskumar PatelSPShreyaskumar Patel
- Neeta SomaiahNSNeeta Somaiah
- Anthony ConleyACAnthony Conley
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 19 December 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
- Vol. 5 (1) , 100
Abstract
Background Immunotherapies, specifically those based on immune checkpoint inhibitors, have shown promising activity in multiple tumor types. Other than mifamurtide (MEPACT®) for osteosarcoma approved by European Medicines Agency, there are no approved immunotherapies for sarcomas. Methods We analyzed medical records of patients with advanced sarcoma who were referred to Phase 1 clinic at MD Anderson and received an immunotherapy (checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, or cytokine based therapies). Clinical parameters including demographics, clinical history, toxicity, and response were abstracted. Results Among 50 patients enrolled in immunotherapy trials (Bone 10; Soft-tissue 40) we found 14 different subtypes of sarcomas. Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score was <2 (86%). Performance status (PS) was 0–1 in 48 patients (96%); median number of prior therapies was 3 (0–12). Immunotherapy consisted of checkpoint inhibitors (82%: PD1 = 7, PD-L1 = 11, CTLA4 = 22, other = 1) of which 42% were combinations, as well as vaccines (14%), and cytokines (4%). Median overall survival (OS) was 13.4 months (11.2 months: not reached). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 2.4 months (95% CI = 1.9–3.2 months). Best response was partial response (PR) in 2 patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) and stable disease (SD) in 11 patients (3 GIST, 3 liposarcomas (2 DDLS, 1 WDLS), 2 ASPS, 2 leiomyo, 1 osteo). PFS was 34% (23%, at 50%) at 3 months, 16% (8%, 30%) at 6 months, and 6% (2%, 20%) at 1 year. Pseudo-progression followed by stable disease was observed in 2 patients (4%). Grade 3/4 adverse events included rash (10%), fever (6%), fatigue (6%), and nausea/vomiting (6%). Conclusion Immunotherapies were well tolerated in advanced sarcoma patients enrolled in trials. All four ASPS patients had clinical benefit with checkpoint inhibitors and this was the only subtype experiencing partial response. Further evaluation of checkpoint inhibitors in ASPS is warranted.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- CCR4 and its ligands: from bench to bedsideInternational Immunology, 2014
- Tumor Infiltrating PD1-Positive Lymphocytes and the Expression of PD-L1 Predict Poor Prognosis of Soft Tissue SarcomasPLOS ONE, 2013
- CD8+tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes at primary sites as a possible prognostic factor of cutaneous angiosarcomaInternational Journal of Cancer, 2013
- Imatinib potentiates antitumor T cell responses in gastrointestinal stromal tumor through the inhibition of IdoNature Medicine, 2011
- Validation of the royal marsden hospital prognostic score in patients treated in the phase I clinical trials program at the MD Anderson Cancer CenterCancer, 2011
- Phase 1 clinical trials for sarcomas: the cutting edgeCurrent Opinion in Oncology, 2011
- The BATTLE Trial: Personalizing Therapy for Lung CancerCancer Discovery, 2011
- Prognostic Impact of Lymphocytes in Soft Tissue SarcomasPLOS ONE, 2011
- MifamurtidePediatric Drugs, 2010
- Alveolar soft-part sarcoma: a review and updateJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2006