Well-being, Measurement, and Preferences
Author:
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Acta Sociologica
- Vol. 38 (1) , 3-15
Abstract
Non-welfarist approaches to well-being are often criticized for ignoring personal pref erences and suffering from a dictatorial logic. This paper argues that welfarist approaches do not have a special quality of preference neutrality and that non-welfarist/non dictatorial approaches to well-being and interpersonal comparison are possible. Utility is a function not of goods and preferences, but of goods and tastes, and the latter are decomposed into expectations and preferences. A theory of well-being based on choice is recommended. Choice is defined as a function of personal resources and arena options. A typology of measurement approaches is developed. Indirect measurement is . recommended above direct measurement. Implications are discussed for income, social indicators, and capabilities in the measurement of well-being.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Equity and Choice1991
- HOUSEHOLDS, STANDARD OF LIVING, AND INEQUALITYReview of Income and Wealth, 1991
- On the Currency of Egalitarian JusticeEthics, 1989
- Equality and equal opportunity for welfarePhilosophical Studies, 1989
- Direct and Indirect Measures of PovertyJournal of Social Policy, 1988
- A Theory of Justice1971
- A Theory of the Allocation of TimeThe Economic Journal, 1965