The Vast Majority Of Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Still Don’t Choose The Cheapest Plans That Meet Their Medication Needs
- 1 October 2012
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs Publishing, LLC in Health Affairs
- Vol. 31 (10) , 2259-2265
Abstract
When the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit began in 2006, a primary concern for some policy makers was whether seniors would be able to make smart choices from among the dozens of competing plans. Using 2009 Part D data, we found that only 5.2 percent of beneficiaries chose the cheapest plan. Nationwide, beneficiaries on average spent $368 more annually than they would have spent had they purchased the cheapest plan available in their region, given their medication needs. More than a fifth of beneficiaries spent at least $500 a year more than they needed to. Beneficiaries often overprotected themselves by paying higher premiums for plan features that they did not need, such as generic drug coverage in the coverage gap. Our findings suggest that beneficiaries need more targeted assistance from the government to help them choose plans, such as customized communications about the most cost-effective plans that would cover their medication needs.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE WELFARE IMPACT OF REDUCING CHOICE IN MEDICARE PART D: A COMPARISON OF TWO REGULATION STRATEGIES*International Economic Review, 2012
- Sources of Regional Variation in Medicare Part D Drug SpendingNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Choice Inconsistencies among the Elderly: Evidence from Plan Choice in the Medicare Part D ProgramAmerican Economic Review, 2011
- Reducing the Number of Drug Plans for Seniors: A Proposal and Analysis of Three Case StudiesJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2010
- Geographic Variation in the Quality of PrescribingNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Geographic Variation in Medicare Drug SpendingNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.Psychological Review, 1996
- Status quo bias in decision makingJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1988