Replaying the Tape of Academia: Fourteen Alternative Practices for the Physical Sciences
Open Access
- 14 July 2024
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Perspectives of Earth and Space Scientists
- Vol. 5 (1)
Abstract
The evolution of modern academic practices, analogous to the evolution of biological systems, reflects the influence of both contingency and determinism. From a theoretical perspective, how then could academic practices differ from those that were inherited? Would any alternative outcomes be more just, equitable, diverse, or inclusive? Here we present 14 alternative academic practices that might be attained upon replaying the tape of academia and evaluate their benefits and drawbacks. Oriented primarily around the physical sciences within the United States, these alternative practices reconsider common activities within the broad categories of the graduate student experience, faculty careers, evaluation methods, peer review and publication, and conference norms. Consideration of these alternative practices can guide within‐system change and large‐scale restructuring of academia to address the myriad challenges facing researchers and students. Conversely, alternative practices may introduce new issues or exacerbate existing problems. These alternative practices are meant to be imaginative, not prescriptive, and we hope their underlying ideas spur reflection and conversation on the existing practices embedded within academic culture. Readers are encouraged to complete a brief survey regarding their impressions of the alternative practices, available at the following link: rebrand.ly/AlternativePractices2024.Keywords
This publication has 62 references indexed in Scilit:
- The art of gathering: histories of international scientific conferencesThe British Journal for the History of Science, 2023
- Are we writing letters of mis-recommendation?Fertility and Sterility, 2023
- Exclusionary Behaviors Reinforce Historical Biases and Contribute to Loss of Talent in the Earth SciencesEarth's Future, 2023
- The search for clean cashNature, 2011
- Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009
- Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authorsTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2008
- Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality?JAMA, 1998
- Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer ReviewJAMA, 1998
- Nepotism and sexism in peer-reviewNature, 1997
- Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted againBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1982