THA Performed using Conventional and Navigated Tissue-preserving Techniques
- 1 December 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Vol. 453, 160-167
Abstract
Less invasive methods of performing total hip arthroplasty have been considered controversial after increased complication rates and component malpositioning were reported. A new method of performing total hip arthroplasty through an incision in the superior capsule, posterior to the abductors and anterior to the posterior capsule, was developed with the aim of producing a technique that maintained the joint stability of the transgluteal exposure and the rapid abductor recovery of the posterior exposure. We assessed the recovery and complications of this technique performed with surgical navigation. The study group was compared with similar subjects who had conventional total hip arthroplasty, without surgical navigation, using the transgluteal exposure. There were 185 consecutive total hip arthroplasties in the study group and 189 nonconsecutive historical total hip arthroplasties in the control group. The two groups were controlled for complexity and had no differences in body mass index, gender, diagnosis, operative side, bilateral operations, and previous surgeries. Patients were evaluated for clinical recovery and perioperative complications at 9 and 24 weeks. The study group recovered faster at both followup examinations. The study group had fewer perioperative and postoperative complications compared with the control group. Accuracy of component positioning was not compromised compared to the control group. Less invasive surgery with the philosophy of maximally preserving the abductors, posterior capsule, and short rotators may result in a safer operation with faster recovery than traditional techniques. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vergleich des Hüftgelenkersatzes über eine posteriore Miniinzision oder einen klassischen anterolateralen ZugangDer Orthopäde, 2006
- Antero-lateral minimal invasive (ALMI) approach for total hip arthroplasty technique and early resultsArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2006
- THE FRANK STINCHFIELD AWARD: Muscle Damage after Total Hip Arthroplasty Done with the Two-incision and Mini-posterior TechniquesClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2005
- Two-incision THA Had Modest Outcomes and Some Substantial ComplicationsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2005
- Single-incision Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty on an Orthopaedic TableClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2005
- Resurfacing Hip ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2005
- Mini-incision for total hip arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2004
- COMPARISON OF PRIMARY TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTS PERFORMED WITH A STANDARD INCISION OR A MINI-INCISIONJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2004
- Technique of tissue-preserving, minimally-invasive total hip arthroplasty using a superior capsulotomyOperative Techniques in Orthopaedics, 2004
- Anterolateral Compared to Posterior Approach in Total Hip ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1982