Efficacy of De‐Epithelialized vs. Subepithelial Grafts in Periodontal Plastic Surgery for Gingival Recession: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Root Coverage Techniques
Open Access
- 9 November 2026
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
- Vol. 12 (6)
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the efficacy of de‐epithelialized gingival graft (DGG) versus subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG) for the treatment of RT1 gingival recessions. Materials and Methods: Five databases were searched with no restrictions for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) directly comparing DGG and SCTG for treating RT1 gingival recessions. Primary outcomes were mean recession coverage (mRC) and complete root coverage (CRC%). Secondary outcomes included keratinized tissue width (KTW) gain, clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, probing depth (PD) change, Root Coverage Esthetic Score (RES), and patient‐reported pain/discomfort (PROs). Random‐effects models (REML) with Hartung–Knapp adjustment were used to calculate mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Six RCTs ( n = 221 patients) were included. No significant difference was observed in mRC (MD = −0.51 mm; 95% CI: −2.06 to 1.03; p = 0.368; I 2 = 95.9%). CRC significantly favored DGG (MD = 4.45%; 95% CI: 1.21–7.69; p = 0.027; I 2 = 0%). Small differences in KTW gain and PD reduction favored DGG, although heterogeneity was substantial for PD change. RES and PROs showed no consistent differences. Conclusions: Both DGG and SCTG are effective for correction of RT1 recessions. DGG showed modest advantages in CRC and PD reduction, while other outcomes were comparable. Clinical Significance: Both de‐epithelialized gingival grafts and subepithelial connective tissue grafts provide predictable root coverage for RT1 gingival recessions. De‐epithelialized grafts may offer a modest advantage in achieving complete root coverage without compromising esthetics or patient comfort, supporting their use as a viable alternative in periodontal plastic surgery.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatments of unesthetic amalgam tattoo: A literature review and a case reportClinical Advances in Periodontics, 2025
- Comparative histological evaluation of intra‐ and extraorally de‐epithelialized connective tissue graft samples harvested from the posterior palate regionJournal of Periodontology, 2023
- Clinical and patient‐centered outcomes using two types of subepithelial connective tissue grafts: A split‐mouth randomized clinical trialJournal of Periodontology, 2020
- The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidenceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2017
- Can subepithelial connective tissue grafts be considered the gold standard procedure in the treatment of Miller Class I and II recession-type defects?Journal of Dentistry, 2008
- Root coverage procedures for the treatment of recession-type defects2008
- Effect of connective tissue graft orientation on the root coverage outcomes of coronally advanced flapClinical Oral Investigations, 2007
- A two-year prospective study of coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graftJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2006
- The connective tissue graft: a comparative clinical evaluation of wound healing at the palatal donor siteJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2002
- Clinical evaluation of free connective tissue grafts used to increase the width of keratinised gingivaJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 1974